Effect of Different Packaging Materials on the Quality of Muscat Grape Juice

Yun Feng Hu; Shu Yan Yu; Rong Qian Wang; Guo Hua Liu; Min Lu; Ping Li

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.469.194

Paper Titles

Preservation Effect of Rhubarb and Cinnamon Extracts on Fresh Beef
p.175

Effects of Molecular Sieve or 1-Methylcyclopropene Combined with SBS/LDPE Packaging on the Shelf-Life of Cherry Tomatoes
p.180

Studies on Respiration Rate Model of Mung Bean Sprout in Modified Atmosphere Packaging
p.185

Effect of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Strawberry Preservation
p.189

Effect of Different Packaging Materials on the Quality of Muscat Grape Juice
p.194

Bioactive Component Extraction from Rhubarb Herb and its Application for the Packaging of Fresh Beef
p.198

Research on the Size Design of Corrugated Box Based on the Standard Pallet Dimension
p.205

Finite Element Simulation of Molded Pulp Pallet in the Dropping Process
p.209

Corrugated Board UV Flute-Shaped Structure Size Optimization Design Based on the Finite Element
p.213

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 469Effect of Different Packaging Materials on the...

Effect of Different Packaging Materials on the Quality of Muscat Grape Juice

Abstract:

Grape juice drinks processed from Muscat grapes as raw material was filled in glass bottle, PP plastic bottle and PE plastic bottle respectively after high temperature sterilizing. Original grape juice acted as control, and then all kinds of nutrients, color and aromatic substances were determined to evaluate the effect of different packaging materials on grape drink quality. The results showed that the content of total acid, reducing sugar and soluble solids of three packaging samples were decreased to some extent, and the color changed significantly. To be more specific, PP plastic packaging samples had the greatest nutrients loss and the most obvious color change. The sample packaging with glass had the most aroma types, the best preservation of the linalool and the maximum content of Terpenoids Chemicals compared to the other two packaging materials. Altogether, the glass was the best package materials compared with the other two materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 469)

Pages:

194-197

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.469.194

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2013

Authors:

Yun Feng Hu*, Shu Yan Yu, Rong Qian Wang, Guo Hua Liu, Min Lu, Ping Li

Keywords:

Aroma, Grape Juice, Nutrient, Packaging Materials

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Lamo, M, Del, Bernal, JL: J. Agric. Food. Chem. Vol. 48 (2000), pp.4613-4618.

Google Scholar

[2] Carrieri, C, Milella, RA and Incampo, F: Food Chem. Vol. 140(2013), pp.647-653.

Google Scholar

[3] Gogus, F, Bozkurt, H and Eren, S: Food Sci. Technol. Vol. 31(1988), pp.196-200.

Google Scholar

[4] Gurak, PD, Cabral, LMC and Rocha-Leao, MHM: J. Food Eng. Vol. 96(2010), pp.421-426.

Google Scholar

[5] Maldonado, MC, Belfiore, C: J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Vol. 35(2008), pp.141-144.

Google Scholar

[6] Hakkinen, SH, Karenlampi, SO: Eur. Food Res. and Technol. Vol. 212(2000), pp.75-80.

Google Scholar

[7] Lawless, LJR, Threlfall, RT: Am. J. of Enol. and Vit. Vol. 63(2012), pp.529-537.

Google Scholar

[8] Arias, R, Lee, TC, Logendra, L, et al: J. Agric. Food. Chem. Vol. 48(2000), pp.1697-1702.

Google Scholar

[9] Demyttenaere, CR: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 98(2003), pp.233-246.

Google Scholar

[10] Francis, L, Cynkar, W and Kwiatkowski, MH: Aust. J. Chem. Vol. 19(2004), pp.12-16.

Google Scholar

[11] Gunata, Z, Bayonove, CR, Baumes, et al: Am. J. Enol. Vit. Vol. 37(1986), pp.112-114.

Google Scholar

[12] Boukoibza, F, Taylor, AJ: Pos. Biol. and Technol. Vol. 25(2002), pp.321-331.

Google Scholar