Influence of He Buffer Gas Pressure on Cs Atomic Polarizability

Article Preview

Abstract:

All optical cesium (Cs) atomic magnetometer with high sensitivity is an important technique to detect weak magnetic field. The Cs vapor cell is filled with He buffer gas to reduce spin relaxation rate. However the pressure of He also influences the Cs atomic polarizability due to pressure broadening effect. In this work, the principle of all optical Cs atomic magnetometer is analyzed. The rate equation is used to calculate Cs atomic polarizability as the pressure of He is about 100Torr and pure Cs vapor cell. The calculation shows that higher pressure of He buffer gas can decrease Cs atomic polarizability without considering spin-exchange collisions, as the pump beam frequency is locked to Cs D1 transition F=3F=4.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

173-176

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, M. V. Romalis. Nature. Vol. 422 (2003), p.596.

DOI: 10.1038/nature01484

Google Scholar

[2] I.M. Savukov, M.V. Romalis. Physical Review Letters. Vol. 94(2005), p.123001.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Xia, A. Ben-Amar Baranga,D. Hoffman, M. V. Romalis. Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 89 (2006), p.211104.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2392722

Google Scholar

[4] C.D. Zhang. Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration. Vol. 29(2005), p.283.

Google Scholar

[5] S. -K. Lee, K.L. Sauer, S.J. Seltzer, O. Alem, M.V. Romalis. Applied Physics Letters. Vol. 89 (2006), p.214106.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Lindseth, P. Schwindt, J. Kitching, D. Fischer, V. Schusterman. Computer in Carduology. Vol. 90(2007), p.443.

Google Scholar

[7] H.B. Dang, A.C. Maloof, M.V. Romalis. Applied Physics Letters. Vol. 97(2010), p.151110.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Liu, X.J. Zeng, J.H. Zhang, Z.J. Huang, W.M. Sun. Journal of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University. Vol. 27(2010), p.814.

Google Scholar

[9] M.P. Ledbetter, I.M. Savukov, V.M. Acosta, D. Budker. Physical Review A. Vol. 77(2008), p.033408.

Google Scholar

[10] J.H. Zhang, Q. Liu, X.J. Zeng, J.X. Li, W.M. Sun. Chin. Phys. Lett. Vol. 29(2012), p.068501.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Harris, C.S. Adams, S.L. Cornish, I.C. Mcleod, E. Tarleton and I.G. Hughes. Physical Review A. Vol. 73(2006), p.62509.

Google Scholar

[12] W. Chalupczak, R.M. Godun, P. Anielski, A. Wojciechowski, S. Pustelny, W. Gawlik. Physical Review A. Vol. 85(2012), p.043402.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.85.043402

Google Scholar

[13] A. Andaikar, R.B. Warrington. Physical Review A. Vol. 65(2008), p.032708.

Google Scholar