Effects of Specific Pressure and the Dual Refiner on Microstructure of the Squeeze-Cast 2024 Aluminum Alloy Drive Hollow Shaft

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effects of specific pressure and the dual refiner of Al-5Ti-1B and Al-10RE on microstructure of the hollow 2024 aluminum alloy drive shaft prepared by squeeze casting in express locomotive were investigated in this paper. With the increasing specific pressure, the ɑ-A1 primary grains became rounder and smaller. With the specific pressure up to 120 MPa, the average grain size of the ɑ-A1 primary grains and the average equivalent roundness were 38 μm and 0.75 respectively. When the dual refiner was adopted, the average grain size of the alloy decreased obviously with a lower mass fraction of A1-5Ti-1B and a higher mass fraction of Al-10RE. However, no obvious change was detected in the average equivalent roundness. The roundness value ranged from 0.62 to 0.72. With the dual refiner of 1wt% Al-5Ti-1B and 3wt% Al-10RE, the average grain size of the alloy and the average equivalent roundness were 26 μm and 0.71 respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

153-156

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. H. Fan, Z. H. Chen, Effects of Pressure and Dual Refiner on Microstructure of the Hollow Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Drive Shaft Prepared by Squeeze Casting, Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys. 6(2012)26-30.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.779-780.78

Google Scholar

[2] P. Z. Chao, T. Tsuchida, Effcet of fabrication conditions and Cr, Zr contents on the grain structure of 7075 and 6061 aluminum alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 499(2009)78-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.094

Google Scholar

[3] D. Liu, H. V. Atkinson, P. Kapranos, Microstrural evolution and tensile mechanical properties of thixoformed high performance aluminium alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 361(2003) 213-224.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00528-8

Google Scholar

[4] W. Y. Kim, C. G. Kang, B. M. Kim, Deformation behavior of wrought aluminum alloys in incremental compression experiment with a closed die, J. Mater. Pro. Tech. 191(2007) 372-376.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.100

Google Scholar

[5] G. A. Chadwick, T. M. Yue, Principles and applications of squeeze castings, Met. Mater. 5(1989)6-11.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Gallerneault, G. Durrant, B. Cantor, Eutectic channeling in a squeeze cast Al-4. 5%Cu alloy, Scripta Metall. Mater. 32(1995)1553-1557.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-716x(94)00030-l

Google Scholar

[7] M. R. Ghomashchi, A. Vikhrov, Squeeze casting: an overview, Mater. Pro. Tech. 101(2000)1-9.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Shehata, Squeeze casting of Al-Cu and Al-Si alloys, Process. Adv. Mater. 4(1994)136-140.

Google Scholar