Predicting the Success of Design Assistive Input Devices for Disabled People

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is important issue to select and design a suitable Assistive Input Devices (AID) for disabled people. This study applies the Incomplete Linguistic Preference Relations (InLinPreRa) analytical framework to predicting the success of design Assistive Input Devices (AID) for disabled people implementation. The results demonstrate that the five most important influential factors are (C6) User-friendly interface (0.166) (C4) Budget (0.163), (C5) Stability of Device (0.159), (C3) easy to maintain (0.144), (C1) easy to operate (0.126). The prediction success rate for AID for disabled people system implementation is 62.7%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

930-933

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. L. Glickman and J. Dixon, Teaching algebra in a situated context through reform computer assisted instruction, Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, vol. 18, pp.57-84, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] K. E. Shubbar, Effectiveness of using computer-assisted instruction in teaching the shapes of atomic orbitals, Science Education International, vol. 14, pp.36-39, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] D. K. Davies, S. E. Stock, and M. L. Wehmeyer, Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer, Mental Retardation, vol. 40, pp.358-365, (2002).

DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0358:eitmso>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[4] J. Bache and G. Derwent, Access to computer-based leisure for individuals with profound disabilities, NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 23, pp.343-350, (2008).

DOI: 10.3233/nre-2008-23408

Google Scholar

[5] H. Ritchie and P. Blanck, The promise of the Internet for disability: a study of on‐line services and web site accessibility at Centers for Independent Living, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, vol. 21, pp.5-26, (2003).

DOI: 10.1002/bsl.520

Google Scholar

[6] C. T. Shih, C. H. Shih, and C. H. Luo, Evaluation of a dynamic pointing assistive program in cursor pointing efficiency for people with disabilities, Technology and Disability, vol. 23, pp.215-222, (2011).

DOI: 10.3233/tad-2011-0328

Google Scholar

[7] S. -C. Hsu and T. -C. Wang, Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, pp.10882-10888, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.123

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Xu, Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion, Information Fusion, vol. 7, pp.331-337, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Xu, A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 20, pp.719-725, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2006.10.002

Google Scholar

[10] T. -H. Chang, S. -C. Hsu, T. -C. Wang, and C. -Y. Wu, Measuring the success possibility of implementing ERP by utilizing the Incomplete Linguistic Preference Relations, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 12, pp.1582-1591, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.12.008

Google Scholar