Comparison on the Characteristics of Bio-Based Porous Carbons by Physical and Novel Chemical Activation

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is significantly abundant portion of waste agricultural materials in the world serving as environmental challenge, however, they could be converted into useful value added products like activated carbon. Coconut shell based carbons were synthesized using physical activation by CO2 and chemical activation with potassium hydroxide and potassium acetate. The BET surface areas and pore volumes are 361m2/g and 0.19cm3/g for physical activation, 1353m2/g and 0.61cm3/g for activation with KOH and 622m2/g and 0.31cm3/g for potassium acetate activated carbon. From the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis, hydroxyls, alkenes and carbonyl functional groups were identified with more prominence on the chemically activated porous carbons. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results showed occurrence of moisture pyrolysis at 105°C, the pyrolysis of hemicellulose and cellulose occurred at 160–390°C and lignin at (390-650°C). Carbonization at 700°C and 2hrs had highest yield of 32%. Physical activation yielded lower surface area with approximately 88% micropores. On the other hand, chemically activation yielded higher surface area with elevated mesopores. The porous carbons can be applied to salvage pollution challenges.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

22-26

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W.A.W.A.K. Ghani, M.S.F. Abdullah, K.A. Matori, A. B. Alias, G. Da Silva, Physical and thermochemical characterization of Malaysian biomass ashes. J. - The Inst. of Engrs., Malaysia. 71 (2010) 9-18.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Yang, J. Peng, C. Srinivasakannan, L. Zhang, H. Xia, X. Duan, Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from coconut shells using microwave heating, Bioresource Technology. 101 (2010) 6163–6169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.001

Google Scholar

[3] H. Deng, G. Li, H. Yang, J. Tang, Preparation of activated carbons from cotton stalk by microwave assisted KOH and K2CO3 activation, Chem. Eng. J. 163 (2010) 373–381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.019

Google Scholar

[4] J.N. Sahu, J. Acharya, and B.C. Meikap, Optimization of production conditions for activated carbons from Tamarind wood by zinc chloride using response surface methodology, Biores. Tech. 101 (2010) 1974–(1982).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.031

Google Scholar

[5] O. Ioannidou, and A. Zabaniotou, Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production: A review, Ren. and Sust. Energy Rev. 11 (2007) 1966–(2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Prauchner, F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, Chemical versus physical activation of coconut shell: A comparative study, Mic. and Meso. Materials, 152 (2012) 163–171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.040

Google Scholar

[7] F. Li, H. Yi, X. Tang, P. Ning, Q. Yu, and D. Kang, Adsorption of carbon dioxide by coconut activated carbon modified with Cu/Ce, J. of Rare Earths. 28 (2010) 334.

DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0721(10)60375-4

Google Scholar

[8] M. Auta, B.H. Hameed, Preparation of waste tea activated carbon using potassium acetate as an activating agent for adsorption of Acid Blue 25 dye, Chem. Eng. J. 171 (2011) 502-509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.017

Google Scholar

[9] W.M.A.W. Daud, W.S.W. Ali, Comparison on pore development of activated carbon produced from palm shell and coconut shell, Biores. Tech. 93 (2004) 63–69.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.015

Google Scholar