Drying Shrinkage of Fly Ash-Based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

The drying shrinkage behaviour of fly-ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGC) was studied for a period of one year. Two SCGC and One OPC-based conventional mixture were used in the present investigation. Drying shrinkage test commenced on the 7th day after casting the test specimens. Once the appropriate curing regime was completed, the specimens from each mix were placed in the laboratory room where the temperature was maintained at 23°C, however, the relative humidity of the room varied between 56 and 64 percent. Strain readings taken at specific intervals were analyzed to determine the time-dependent deformations of each mixture. Test results indicated that the heat-cured fly ash-based SCGC experienced very low drying shrinkage than that of water-cured OPC based concrete. After one year of exposure, in comparison to 466 με, the value experienced by OPC concrete, the drying shrinkage strains of SCGC mix specimens ranged between 141 and 159 με. These values were about 65-70% lower than that of OPC concrete. It is anticipated that the findings of this investigation would help in predicting the behaviour of SCGC. Keywords-Fly ash, Geopolymer concrete, Self-compacting Geopolymer concrete, Drying shrinkage

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

362-368

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Hardjito, and B. V. Rangan, Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Research Report GC-1, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] V. M. Malhotra, Introduction: Sustainable development and concrete technology, ACI Concrete International, vol. 24, no. 7, p.22, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] T. R. Naik, Sustainability of cement and concrete industries, in International Conference on Global Construction: Ultimate Concrete Opportunities, Dundee, Scotland, July 2005, pp.141-150.

DOI: 10.1680/asic.34044.0017

Google Scholar

[4] B. V. Rangan, Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Research Report GC-4, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Mindess, F. J. Young, and D. Darwin, Concrete, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2003).

Google Scholar

[6] S. E. Wallah, and B. V. Rangan, Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties, Research Report GC-2, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Palomo, A. Fernandez-Jimenez, C. L. Hombrados, J. L. Lleyda, Precast elements made of Alkali-activated fly ash concrete, in Eighth CANMET/ ACI International Conference on Fly ash, Silica Fume, Slag adn Natural Pozzolans in concrete, Los Vegas, USA, (2004).

DOI: 10.14359/13260

Google Scholar

[8] M. Olivia and H. Nikraz, Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method, Materials and Design, vol. 36, pp.191-198, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036

Google Scholar

[9] S. D. Wang, X. C. Pu, K. L. Scrivener, P. L. Pratt, Alkali-activated slag cement and concrete: a review of properties and problems, Advance Cement Research, vol. 7, no. 27, p.93– 102, (1995).

DOI: 10.1680/adcr.1995.7.27.93

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM C 618-05, Standard Specification for Coal Fly ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use as Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04, no. 02, (2005).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-15

Google Scholar

[11] BS EN 450-1: 2005, Fly ash for concrete - Part 1: Definition, specifications and conformity criteria, British-Adopted European Standard, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] BS EN 13263-1: 2005+A1: 2009, Silica fume for concrete – Part 1: Definitions, requirements and conformity criteria, British-Adopted European Standard, (2009).

Google Scholar

[13] Memon, F.A., Nuruddin, M.F., and Shafiq, N., Effect of Silica fume on Fresh and Hardened properties of Fly ash-based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2013, pp.205-213.

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-013-0714-7

Google Scholar

[14] BS EN 197-1: 2000, Cement – Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, British-Adopted European Standard, (2000).

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM C 157-08, Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04. 02 Concrete and Concrete Aggregates, American Society for Testing and Material, (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/c0157_c0157m-03

Google Scholar

[16] K. Sagoe-Crentsil , T. Brown and A. Taylor, Drying shrinkage and creep performance of geopolymer concrete, Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, vol. 2, no. 1, pp.35-42, (2013).

DOI: 10.1080/21650373.2013.764963

Google Scholar