A New Decision Support Methodology for Subway Operation Management

Article Preview

Abstract:

Subway is usually one of the largest infrastructure in the city, is also the arteries of urban passenger transportation, and urban lifeline. The subway operation safety problem has become the primary problem in metro operation. This paper presents a new method for decision support operational risk evaluation of subway. This new method not only can evaluate the subway operation safety, but also can be safety in subway operation management in weak links, to ensure the subway operation safety.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1729-1732

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ritesh K, Lyes B. Fuzzy Logic and Interval Arithmetic-Based TOPSIS Method for Multicriteria Reverse Auctions. SERVICE SCIENCE(2012)(4): 101–117.

DOI: 10.1287/serv.1120.0009

Google Scholar

[2] PAN Ke, SHI Jian-yun. Application of Variable Weight Theory and Relative Difference Function to Safety Assess-ment of Urban Subway. s Operation. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31(3): 20-25.

Google Scholar

[3] Jiayang Li. Kaining. L, Yingqiu.G. New Fuzzy Multi-Level Comprehensive Methodology for Safety Risk of Subway Operation[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 373-375 (2013) pp.2195-2199.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.373-375.2195

Google Scholar

[4] Patrick X. W Zou , Jie L. Risk identification and assessment in subway projects: case study of Nanjing Subway Line 2. Construction Management and Economics, 2010(28): 1219–1238.

DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2010.519781

Google Scholar

[5] Wei.H. H. Analysis on the Current Situation of Risk Managementon Metro Operation Safety. China Safety Science Journal , 2008( 7): 55-62.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang YM, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 51(1–2): 1–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016

Google Scholar