Comparisons and Decisions on Construction Methods from an Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Perspective

Yi Hua Mao; Bing Xi Han

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.587-589.767

Paper Titles

The Methods of Agricultural Residues Disposal and their Externalities in Xinyi, China
p.740

Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Green Ecological Mine Construction Based on ISM
p.748

Activation of Ca-Based CO₂ Sorbent by Hydration in Repetitive Calcination-Carbonation Reactions
p.755

Analysis of Problems of Online Monitoring about Liaohe River Basin Water Pollution Source through Analytic Hierarchy Process
p.761

Comparisons and Decisions on Construction Methods from an Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Perspective
p.767

Construction of Ecological Environment Management Platform Based on Supermap IS.NET
p.772

Determination and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals on the Source of Underground Water in Yulin City
p.776

Diffusion Model of Atmospheric Fine Particles PM2.5 under the Direction of the Wind
p.780

Landslide Groundwater Dynamic Monitoring in the Process of Water Content Instrument Installation Technology Research
p.784

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 587-589Comparisons and Decisions on Construction Methods...

Comparisons and Decisions on Construction Methods from an Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Perspective

Abstract:

This paper established a evaluation model of construction methods aiming at the key indexes including energy consumption, carbon emission and cost. The model disassembles the energy consumption and carbon emission into four parts, i.e. labor, material, transportation, and manufacture construction. The corresponding module calculation method is proposed. A calculation example is presented. It is about a comparison among five typical foundation treatments. With this evaluation model, the performance ranking is yielded, which is cement-flyash-gravle pile, vibroflotation, high-pressure jet grouting, cement deep mixing, sand-gravle pile.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Sustainable Cities Development and Environment Protection IV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 587-589)

Pages:

767-771

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.587-589.767

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Yi Hua Mao, Bing Xi Han*

Keywords:

Carbon Emission (CE), Cost, Energy Consumption (EC), Foundation Treatment

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Weiding Long, Gaijing Zhang, Hao Liang, et al. Journal of HV&AV, 2010, 40(3)：6~11. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhanqiang Fang, Guanping Ren. Implementation of Energy audit principles and measures [M]. Beijing：Chemical Industry Publishing House, 2008. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Hammond G. & Jones C., Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) Version 2. 0[R], Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Bath, UK, (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Miansong Huang, Hu Zhou, Xuehui An, Feng Jin, The Environmental Impact Assessment of Rock-Filled- Concretetechnology In Dam Construction[C]. Hydropower 2006. [s. n. ], 2006： 1188~1197.

Google Scholar

[5] Specification of building foundation treatment technology JGJ79-2002[S]. Beijing：China academy of Building Research, 2002. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Budget Ration of Zhejiang Province Construction Engineering [S]. Beijing：China Planning Press, 2010. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] GhaffarianHoseini A H, Dahlan N D, Berardi U, et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 25: 1~17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.010

Google Scholar