Effect of Superficial Gas Velocity on the Separation Efficiency of Inline Horizontal Swirl Tube Separator

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of compact, inline separator has gain interest in the effort of reducing the size of topside facilities to reduce the capital cost associated with natural gas exploration. This paper discusses the effect of superficial gas velocity on the separation performance of an inline horizontal swirl tube separator. In this study, the superficial velocity is varied from a minimum of 5 m/s up to a maximum velocity of 12 m/s at different operating pressure. The pressure is varied from 40, 50 and 60 bars, corresponding to different centrifugal force on the incoming gas stream. Results shows that the best separation performance is achieve at higher operating pressure, in this case at 60 bar, regardless of the incoming fluid velocity and liquid load (of up to 30% by mass).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

566-569

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. H Rawlins, The case for compact separation, Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol 55, no 5, 77-79, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] A.A. Hamoud, A. Boudi, S.D. Al-Qahtani, New application of an inline separation technology in a real wet gas field, paper presented at Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, November (2008).

DOI: 10.2118/117459-ms

Google Scholar

[3] A. A Hamoud, S.M. Al-Ghamdi, Applications of multiphase technologies optimize upstream operations in Saudi Aramco, paper presented at Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conferences and Exhibitions, Perth, Australia, October (2008).

DOI: 10.2118/115230-ms

Google Scholar

[4] D.P. Birmingham, SPLIT-FLO separator: A compact gas and oil separator for hydrocarbon production, paper presented at Offshore Western Australia, April (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] F.R. van Baarsel, W. Loots, Compact offshore gas/liquid separation systems saves costs, paper presented at European Petroleum Conference, Milan, Italy, 22-24th October, (1996).

DOI: 10.2118/36941-ms

Google Scholar

[6] A. C Hoffmann, L.E. Stein, Gas cyclones and swirl tubes, 2nd Edition, New York, Springer, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Swanborn, R. Egwim, Accelerated production and increased recovery of remote (offshore) mature fields through novel methods to design and operate surface production facilities, paper presented at Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 2-5th May (2011).

DOI: 10.4043/21615-ms

Google Scholar

[8] T. Austrheim, L. Gjertsen, A. Hoffman, Experimental investigation of the performance of large scale scrubber operating at elevated pressure on live natural gas, Fuel, vol 87, pp.1281-1288, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.07.022

Google Scholar

[9] T. Austrheim, Experimental characteristaion of high pressure natural gas scrubbers, Ph. D Dissertation, 2006, Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Norway.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Mellon, A.M. Shariff, Performance assessment of an inline horizontal swirl tube cyclone for gas-liquid separation at high pressure, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 20, p.565 – 567, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-9953(10)60245-9

Google Scholar

[11] E. Mondt, E. van Kemenade, R. Schook, Operating performance of naturally driven rotational particle separator, Chemical Engineering & Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.375-383, March (2006).

DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200500395

Google Scholar