Knowledge Sharing Research on Web 2.0

Abstract:

As Web 2.0 services emphasize the integration of distributed information and applications on a network, we gleaned from science citation index expanded (SCI-EXPANED) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) database on web of science, concerning advances in collaboration research in Web 2.0. The result indicates that the number of publication literatures on this topic mainly distributes in recent 7 years, and citations reach climax of 22 in 2013. The main research territory is USA, accounting for 40%. And from the analysis of research area, Engineering accounts for 40%. Overall, the related research topics can be classified in four areas: annotation system for knowledge sharing, determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0, adoption of Web 2.0 for knowledge sharing and knowledge sharing successes in Web 2.0.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 631-632)
• Pages: 1136-1139
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.631-632.1136
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Bing Wu*, Chen Yan Zhang
• Keywords: Adoption of Web 2.0, Annotation System, Knowledge Sharing, Web 2.0

References

[1] Chen, C.Y., C.J. Chang, and C.H. Lin, On dynamic access control in web 2. 0 and cloud interactive information hub: trends and theories. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2014. 20(4): pp.548-560.

DOI: 10.1177/1077546312463762

[2] McNutt, K., Public engagement in the Web 2. 0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context. Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada, 2014. 57(1): pp.49-70.

DOI: 10.1111/capa.12058

[3] Wiewiora, A., et al., Interactions Between Organizational Culture, Trustworthiness, and Mechanisms for Inter-Project Knowledge Sharing. Project Management Journal, 2014. 45(2): pp.48-65.

DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21407

[4] Su, A.Y.S., et al., A Web 2. 0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 2010. 55(2): pp.752-766.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008

[5] Lee, H., E. Reid, and W.G. Kim, Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Online Travel Communities Antecedents and the Moderating Effects of Interaction Modes. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 2014. 38(2): pp.222-242.

DOI: 10.1177/1096348012451454

[6] Paroutis, S. and A. Al Saleh, Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2. 0 technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2009. 13(4): pp.52-63.

DOI: 10.1108/13673270910971824

[7] Wang, S., R.A. Noe, and Z.M. Wang, Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems A Quasi-Field Experiment. Journal of Management, 2014. 40(4): pp.978-1009.

DOI: 10.1177/0149206311412192

[8] Lau, A.S.M., Hospital-Based Nurses' Perceptions of the Adoption of Web 2. 0 Tools for Knowledge Sharing, Learning, Social Interaction and the Production of Collective Intelligence. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011. 13(4).

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1398

[9] Xin, J.Y., et al., Analyzing the Use of Web 2. 0 for Brand Awareness and Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study in the Malaysian Hospitability Industry. Information Systems Management, 2014. 31(2): pp.96-103.

DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2014.890425

[10] Allen, J.P., Knowledge-Sharing Successes in Web 2. 0 Communities. Ieee Technology and Society Magazine, 2010. 29(1): pp.58-64.

DOI: 10.1109/mts.2010.935990

[11] Newland, B. and L. Byles, Changing academic teaching with Web 2. 0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2014. 51(3): pp.315-325.

DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2013.796727

[12] Shimazu, H. and S. Koike, KM2. 0: Business knowledge sharing in the Web 2. 0 age. Nec Technical Journal, 2007. 2(2): pp.50-54.