Seismic Behavior Factor of Moment Resisting Steel Frame-Steel Plate Shear Wall

Abstract:

The seismic behavior factor of moment resisting steel frame-steel plate shear wall under two different horizontal loading patterns was investigated according to the maximum inter-story drift ratio reaching 1/50. It could be achieved with the same calculated standard as the foreign codes and the determined behavior factor was compared with foreign research results. The method using the software SAP2000 to calculate seismic behavior factor according to the maximum inter-story drift ratio reaching 1/50 was presented and the specific example was used to elaborate the operating process. The seismic behavior factor R, the overstrength factor R_Ω and the ductility reduction factor R_μ of 10-storey 3-span steel frame-steel plate shear wall under the inverted triangle load are respectively 6.07, 2.96 and 2.05. while they are respectively 7.2, 3.37 and 2.13 under the uniform load. Finally, it can be concluded that the economic and reasonable design goals are achieved for this structure.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 638-640)
• Pages: 1932-1936
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.638-640.1932
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Jian Hua Shao*, Qun Wu
• Keywords: Capacity Spectrum Method, Inter-Story Drift Ratio, Seismic Behavior Factor, Steel Plate Shear Wall

References

[1] Lin C H, Tsai K C, Qu B, et al. Sub-structural pseudo-dynamic performance of two full-scale two-story steel plate shear walls [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(12): 1467-1482.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.05.013

[2] Li C H, Tasi K C, Chang J T, et al. Cyclic test of a coupled steel plate shear wall substructure [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 14(1): 582-589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.073

[3] Berman J W. Seismic behavior of code designed steel plate shear walls [J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(1): 230-244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.015

[4] Asgarian B, Shokrgozar H R. BRBF response modification factor [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(2): 290-298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.002

[5] Mahmoudi M, Zaree M. Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(10): 1196-1204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004

[6] Mahmoudi M, Mohammad G A. Evaluating response modification factors of TADAS frames [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 71(4): 162-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.015

[7] Izadinia M, Rahgozar M A, Omid M. Response modification factor for steel moment-resisting frames by different pushover analysis methods [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 79(12): 83-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.010

[8] Tong G S. Method for design of steel structures [M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2007. (in Chinese).

[9] Shao J H. Research on structural influencingcoefficient and deflection amplification factor of moment-resisting steel frame-steel plate shear wall [D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2008. (in Chinese).