Comparative Investigation on the Seismic Performance of a Benchmark Steel Frame with Different Bracing Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs) have been verified as novel energy dissipation bracing systems. This paper conducted a comparative investigation on the seismic-resisting performance of a Benchmark steel frame with these two types of bracing systems using the finite element analysis software OpenSEES. The analysis demonstrated that, in the equal-strength design principle, the SC-BRB frame results in weaker energy dissipation, bigger story drifts, and more evenly distributed story drifts along the building height compared to BRB frame. The residual deformations of SC-BRB frame under strong earthquakes are significantly smaller than the pure frame as well as BRB frame, but the maximum axial bracing force and floor accelerations are increased significantly for SC-BRB frame.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1917-1922

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Blac C.J., Makris N., Aiken L.D. Component testing seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(6): 880-894.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880)

Google Scholar

[2] Chen C. C, Chen S. Y, Liaw J.J. Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2001, 28(5): 823-836.

DOI: 10.1139/l01-044

Google Scholar

[3] Sabelli R., Mahin S.A., Chang C. Seismic demands on steel braced-frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces [J]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25: 655–666.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00175-x

Google Scholar

[4] Kiggins S., Uang C.M. Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system [J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28: 1525-1532.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.023

Google Scholar

[5] Miller D., Fahnestock L., Eatherton M. Self-centering buckling-restrainedbraces for advanced seismic performance[C]. The 2011 Structures Congress, ASCE, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. (2011).

DOI: 10.1061/41171(401)85

Google Scholar

[6] Zhen Zhou, Xianting He, Jing Wu. Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace with BFRP composite tendons[J]. Steel and composite structures, 2014, 16(5): 491-506.

DOI: 10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.491

Google Scholar

[7] Robert Tremblay, M. Lacerte, C. Christopoulos. Seismic response of multistory buildings with self-centering energy dissipative steel braces [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 108-120.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:1(108)

Google Scholar