Research on Depth Evaluation of Surface Crack in Laser Cladding Coating with Metal Magnetic Memory Technology

Abstract:

Depth of evaluation method of surface crack in laser cladding coating with metal magnetic memory was introduced in this paper. Laser cladding coating specimen were degaussed, placement direction of specimen and detection direction unchanged, detection speed and lift off value of probe were the constant. Results show that gradient value of H_p(y) signal corresponding to surface crack increases as tensile load increases under the same depth of surface crack, gradient value of H_p(y) signal corresponding to surface crack increases as depth of surface crack increases under the same tensile load. Orientation of internal magnetic domain changes as tensile load changes and magnetic leakage field caused by surface crack are seen as two main reasons for above results. Using fitting method with quadratic polynomial, depth of surface crack in laser cladding coating can be evaluated nondestructively in this paper.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 651-653)
• Pages: 73-77
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.651-653.73
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Bin Liu*, Zhu Jing Shao, Shi Yun Dong
• Keywords: Depth Evaluation, Laser Cladding Coating, Metal Magnetic Memory, Surface Crack

References

[1] ZHANG Jian, QIU Bin, ZHAO Longzhi. Latest Developments of Laser Cladding Technology[J]. Material & Heat Treatment, 2011, 40(18): 116-119.

[2] ZHANG Jian, WU Wenni, ZHAO Longzhi. Research Progress and Development Trend of Laser Cladding [J]. Hot Working Technology, 2013, 42(6): 131-134.

[3] DOUBOV A A. Express method of quality control of aspot resistance welding with usage of metal magnetic memory[J]. Welding in the World, 2002(46): 317-320.

[4] DOUBOV A A．Principle features of metal magnetic memory method and inspection tools as compared to known magnetic NDT methods[J]. Cinde Journal, 2006, 27(3): 16-20.

[5] DOUBOV A A. Diagnostics of boiler tubes with usage of metal magnetic memory[M]．Moscow: Energoatomizdat, (1995).

[6] LI Guangji, Sun Guohao, Pan Jiazhen. Metal magnetic memory testing disfigurement testing rate[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edit ion), 2006, 32(8): 1007-1011.

[7] GONG Lihong, Li Zhuxin, Liu Shujun. Research of the defect quantification and life prediction of pipelines based on metal magnetic memory[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2013, (6): 14-16.

[8] LONG Feifei1, Gao Guozhu, Zhang Xiaoyong, et al. Study on magnetic memory testing technique of crack in plate and weld seam[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(7): 102-108.

[9] LIU Shujun, Li Zhuxi, Gong Lihon, et al. Study on defect detect of oil and gas pipeline by metal magnetic memory testing technology based on wavelet analysis[J]. Machine Tool＆ Hydraulics, 2011, 39(21): 54-56.

[10] DONG Lihong, XU Binshi, DONG Shiyun, et al. Influence of manufacturing process on metal magnetic memory signals in ferromagnetic materials[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2010, 23(4): 82-85.

[11] America Society for Nondestructive Testing. Nondestructive testing handbook- electromagnetic[M]. Beijing: World Book Press, (1994).

[12] WANG Dan. Detection method and instrument of remaining life of remanufacturing core[D]. Beijing, Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, (2008).

[13] CHEN Xi, REN Jilin, WANG Weilan, et al. Effect of stress on magnetic domain structure in earth magnetic[J]. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2007, 2(1): 6-9.