Automatically Collect the Adjectives and Calculate their Sentiment Intensity in the Sentiment Analysis

Hui Wang; Xiao Hong Ji; Jun Ma

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.668-669.1138

Paper Titles

The Cauchy Problem for Impulsive Transport Equations
p.1122

The Research of Speech Emotion Recognition Based on Gaussian Mixture Model
p.1126

The Semi-Discrete Finite Element Method for the Cauchy Equation
p.1130

The Stability of Solution Set to η-Set-Valued Weak Vector Variational Inequality Problem
p.1134

Automatically Collect the Adjectives and Calculate their Sentiment Intensity in the Sentiment Analysis
p.1138

Clustering within the Framework of Hesitant Fuzzy Sets
p.1143

Feature-Weighted Local Support Vector Machine of Particle Swarm Optimization
p.1147

Video Redirection Parameters Optimization Based on Hierarchical Genetic Optimization Strategy
p.1152

A Novel Denoising Method Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition – Principle Component Analysis
p.1157

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 668-669Automatically Collect the Adjectives and Calculate...

Automatically Collect the Adjectives and Calculate their Sentiment Intensity in the Sentiment Analysis

Abstract:

In order to automatically expand high quality polarity adjectives as much as possible by using the WordNet, three types of query strings are used in this study. Among them, the third type of query string is the most important. Besides ‘synonym’ and ‘antonym’ relations, we also use ‘similar to’ and ‘also see’ relations of the WordNet. In fact, the last two relations are more important than the first two ones. With the help of the newly proposed method, we can calculate the sentiment intensity of those expanded adjectives exactly. Abundant experiments demonstrate that our improved POAE algorithm is very effective in expanding and ranking adjective seed list in the sentiment analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Mechanical Components and Control Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 668-669)

Pages:

1138-1142

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.668-669.1138

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Hui Wang*, Xiao Hong Ji, Jun Ma

Keywords:

Antonym, Opinion Mining, Sentiment Analysis, Sentiment Intensity, Synonym, Wordnet

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] B. Pang, L. Lee. Foundations and trends in information retrieval, 2008, 2(1-2): 1-135.

Google Scholar

[2] Minqing Hu and B. Liu. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD, Aug 22-25, 2004, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Blair-Goldensohn, K. Hannan, R. McDonald, et al. Building a sentiment summarizer for local service reviews[C]/WWW Workshop on NLP in the Information Explosion Era. 2008: 14.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Andreevskaia and S. Bergler. Mining WordNet for a fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings of the European Chapter of EACL, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. PageRanking WordNet synsets: An application to opinion mining. in Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Kamps, M. Marx, R. Mokken and M. de Rijke. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proc. Of LREC-2004, pp: 1115-1118, (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] S. -M. Kim and E. Hovy. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), (2004).

DOI: 10.3115/1220355.1220555

Google Scholar

[8] Peter D. Turney. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th ACL, pp: 417-424, (2002).

DOI: 10.3115/1073083.1073153

Google Scholar

[9] S. Banerjee and T. Pedersen. An Adapted Lesk Algorithm for Word Sense Disambiguation Using WordNet. Proceedings of the Fourth International CICLING. Mexico City, Mexico, (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45715-1_11

Google Scholar

[10] W. Hui and M. Jun. Journal of computational information systems, 2012, 8(16): 6569-6577.

Google Scholar

[11] B. Liu, Minqing Hu and Junsheng Cheng. Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web. Proceedings of the WWW-2005, May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan.

DOI: 10.1145/1060745.1060797

Google Scholar

[12] Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe and Paul Hoffmann. Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, Canada.

DOI: 10.3115/1220575.1220619

Google Scholar