Physical Properties and Microstructure of the Fly Ash Based-Geopolymer/Granule Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this research, the fly ash (F/A) discharged from a thermal power plant was recycled to manufacture geopolymer containing granules instead of sand. Several types of granules using fly ash were assessed. The properties of the geopolymer/granule composites were analyzed as a function of the crystalline phase and size of the granules, as well as the molding pressure. The compressive strength and density of the geopolymer composites containing the hydrated granules fabricated by hand-tapping were 5.7 MPa and 1.47 g/cm3, respectively, while composites created by pressure molding were 15.6 MPa and 1.73 g/cm3. These results are comparative or superior to those of commercial cement bricks (8 MPa according to KS F 4004). Therefore, the geopolymer/granule composites fabricated in this study can be applied to cement bricks and can be a base for the enhancement of the recycling rate of fly ash.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

54-60

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Palomo, M.W. Grutzeck, M.T. Blanco, Alkali-activate fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cement Concrete Res. 29 (1999) 1323-1329.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00243-9

Google Scholar

[2] R. V. Rangan, Low-calcium fly-ash based geopolymer concrete, In: Nawy EG, editor. Concrete construction engineering handbook. New York: CRC Press. (2007).

DOI: 10.1201/9781420007657.ch26

Google Scholar

[3] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37 (1991) 1633-1656.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Duxson, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, J.S.J. van Deventer, The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of green concrete, Cem Concr Res 37 (2007) 1590-1597.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018

Google Scholar

[5] B.V. Rangan, D. Hardjito, S.E. Wallah, D.M.J. Sumajouw, Studies on fly ash based geopolymer concrete, in: J. Davidovits (Ed. ), Proceedings of 4th World Congress on Geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France, 2005, p.133–137.

DOI: 10.1080/13287982.2005.11464946

Google Scholar

[6] A. Fernandez-Jimenez, A. Palomo, Characterization of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements, Fuel 82 (2003) 2259–2265.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00194-7

Google Scholar

[7] F. Skvara, J. Bohunek, Chemical activation of substances with latent hydraulic properties, Ceram. Silik. 43 (1999) 111–116.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Puri, A. Badanoiu, G. Voicu, Eco-Friendly binders based on fly ash, Rev. Roum. Chim. 53 (2008) 1069–1076.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Anderson, G. Jackson, The history of pulverzed fuel ash in brick making in gritain, J of Inst OF Ceramics. 4 (1987) 99-135.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Anderson, G. Jackson, The benefication of power sation coal ash and its use in heavy clay ceramics, J. Brit Ceram. Soc. 2 (1983) 50-55.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Ghrici, S. Kenai, M. Said-Mansour, Mechanical properties and durability of mortar and concrete containing natural pozzolana and lime stone blended cements, Concrete composites. 29 (2007) 542-549.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.009

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Y. Kim, J.K. Lee, H. Song, Y.S. Chu, C.W. Kwon, N.K. Part, Hydration properties of cement mortars using active admixture. Korea Concrete Institute. 11 (2007) 785-788.

Google Scholar

[13] N.S. Pandian, Fly ash characterization with reference to geotechnical applications. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 84 (2004) 189-216.

Google Scholar

[14] M.J. Kim, X. Wang, J.J. Lee, S.H. Lee, S.B. Kim, C.J. Kim, Development of flowable backfill material using waste oyster shell, coal ash, and surplus soil. Clean Technology. 19 (2013) 423-429.

DOI: 10.7464/ksct.2013.19.4.423

Google Scholar

[15] S. Ahmari, L. Zhang, Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization, Cons. And Building. Materals. 29 (2012) 323-331.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.048

Google Scholar