Research on the Rehabilitation Robot Control Methods for Analysis of Lower Limb Kinetics during Sit to Stand Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new method for analyzing lower limb kinetics during sit to stand process is presented, and a trajectory control method (TCM) and an impedance control method (ICM) for a rehabilitation robot are developed. During the sit to stand process (SSP), body segment rotational angles, movement trajectories, ground reaction forces (GRF), center of pressure (COP) and rope tensile forces are measured by the robot sensor system, and the joint moments of ankle, knee and hip are calculated in real-time control program. Test experiments were performed on six volunteers. The experimental results validate the theory that the control methods can assure the accomplishment of the sit to stand process in comfortable postures, and improve the condition of joint moments. The control methods are suitable for self-supported home training, and can be applied to assess kinetics parameters during the sit to stand process and improve the rehabilitation of patients.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

535-539

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Hirata, T. Sakaki, S. Okada, Z. Nakamoto, N. Hiraki, Y. Okajima, S. Uchida, Y. Tomita, T. Horiuchi, BRMS: Bio-Resposive Motion System (Rehabilitation System for Stroke Patients), Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems EPFL, Lausanne. Switzerland, p.1344–1348, Oct. (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/irds.2002.1043941

Google Scholar

[2] J. Yoon, B. Novandy, C. H. Yoon, and K. J. Park, A 6-DOF Gait Rehabilitation Robot With Upper and Lower Limb Connections That Allows Walking Velocity Updates on Various Terrains, IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 15, no. 2, p.201–215, Apr. (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2010.2040834

Google Scholar

[3] D. Aoyagi, W. E. Ichinose, S. J. Harkema, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and J. E. Bobrow, A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury, IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, p.387–400, Sep. (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2007.903922

Google Scholar

[4] J. F. Veneman, R. Kruidhof, E. E. G. Hekman, R. Ekkelenkamp, E. H. F. V. Asseldonk, and H. Kooij, Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation, IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, p.379–386, Sep. (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2007.903919

Google Scholar

[5] A. Tsukahara, Y. Hasegawa, and Y. Sankai, Standing-Up Motion Support for Paraplegic Patient with Robot Suit HAL, 2009 IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, Kyoto. Japan, p.211–217, Jun. (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2009.5209567

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Mori, J. Okada, and K. Takayama, Development of a Standing Style Transfer System 'ABLE' for Disabled Lower Limbs, IEEE /ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 11, no. 4, p.372–380, Aug. (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2006.878558

Google Scholar