Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Ball Pressure Test Based on Reading Microscope

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ball pressure test is the heat resistance test of the electrical products material, whether it meets the requirements of material performance to eliminate security risks. Using reading microscope for ball pressure test measurement and its measurement uncertainty was analyzed in this paper, including measurement uncertainty sources, established mathematical model, uncertainty example and measurement uncertainty result. The measurement uncertainty was analyzed to ensure the accuracy of ball pressure test measurement result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

61-64

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3: 2008. Uncertainty of measurement-Part3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in Measurement[S].

Google Scholar

[2] ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3/SUPP. 1. Uncertainty of measurement-Part3/ Supplement 1: Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method[S].

Google Scholar

[3] Weiping Wang, Yongbin Zhao. Research on uncertainty in motor test data fitting [J]. MICROMOTORS, 2011, 44(8): 92-94 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] An Wang, Duifeng Yan, Dong Cui, et al. Treceability and uncertainties assessment of short -time alternating current RMS measuring system in higher power laboratories[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2014,50(4):72-76 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Paul D. Hale, C.M. Jack Wang. Calculation of pulse parameters and propagation of uncertainty [J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 58(3): 639-648.

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2008.2005560

Google Scholar

[6] James R. Hockenberry, Bernard C. Lesieutre. Evaluation of uncertainty in dynamic simulation of power system models: the probabilistic collocation method [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(3): 1483-1491.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2004.831689

Google Scholar

[7] Ian A. Hiskens, Jassim Alseddiqui. Sensitivity, approximation, and uncertainty in power system dynamic simulation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1808-1820.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2006.882460

Google Scholar

[8] Yan Wan, Sandip Roy, Bernard Lesieutre. Uncertainty evaluation trough mapping identification in intensive dynamic simulations [J]. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2010, 40(5): 1094-1104.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2010.2044172

Google Scholar

[9] Jun Li, Yong Zhu. Monto-Carlo simulation applied on measurement uncertainty evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2006, 27(6): 1282-1283 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Zhiguo Ma, Yitai Ma, Wei Lu. The application of uncertainty analysis theory in thermal efficiency testing for boiler [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(3): 125-129 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Yuan Zhao, Zhijian Shen, Niancheng Zhou, et al. Probabilistic uncertainty analysis of Monte-Carlo simulation for bulk power system reliability evaluation [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(28): 61-67 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Jianhua Chen, Wenchuan Wu, Boming Zhang, et al. Quantitative evaluation of parameter uncertainty in power system dynamic simulation [J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 34(11): 18-23 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar