Methodology and Warm Prestressing Effect for Pressurized Thermal Shock Analysis in Nuclear Power Plant

Abstract:

One potential challenge to the integrity of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in a pressurized water reactor is posed by pressurized thermal shock (PTS). Therefore, the safety of the RPV with regard to neutron embrittlement has to be analyzed. In this paper, the procedure and method for the structural integrity analysis of RPV subjected to PTS is presented. The FAVOR code is applied to calculate the probabilities for crack initiation and failure by considering crack distributions based on cracks observed in the Shoreham and PVRUF RPVs in the U.S. A local approach to fracture, i.e. the σ*-A* model is used to predict the warm prestressing (WPS) effect on the RPV integrity. The results show that the remaining stress contributes to the WPS effect, whereas the increase of fracture toughness is not completely attributed to the remaining stress. The modeled load paths predict a material toughness increase of 30-100%.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 750)
• Pages: 104-113
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.750.104
• Online since: April 2015
• Authors: Gui An Qian*, Markus Niffenegger
• Keywords: Fracture Toughness, Pressurized Thermal Shock, Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics, Reactor Pressure Vessel, Warm Prestressing

References

[1] G. Qian, M. Niffenegger, Procedure, method and computer codes for probabilistic assessment of reactor pressure vessels subjected to pressurized thermal shocks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 258 (2013) 35-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.030

[2] International atomic energy agency, Pressurised thermal shock in nuclear power plants: good practices for assessment, IAEA, Austria, IAEA-TECDOC-1627, (2010).

[3] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Section 50. 61, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events, (1984).

[4] M.T. EricksonKirk, M. Junge, W. Arcieri, B.R. Bass, R. Beaton, D. Bessette, et al., Technical Basis for Revision of the Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Screening Limit in the PTS Rule (10CFR 50. 61): Summary Report, NUREG 1806, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, May, NUREG -1806, (2006).

[5] M. Niffenegger, K. Reichlin, The proper use of thermal expansion coefficients in finite element calculations, Nucl. Eng. Des. 243 (2012) 356-59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.12.006

[6] J.C. Newman, I.S. Raju, Stress-intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads. NASA technical memorandum 85793, NASA, (1984).

[7] ASME, ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section XI, rules for inservice inspection of nuclear power plant components, Appendix A, New York, (1998).

DOI: 10.1115/1.859872.ch29

[8] ASME, ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section III, nuclear power plant components, New York, (1995).

[9] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide, No. 1. 99, Revision 2, Radiation embrittlement of reactor vessel materials, (1988).

[10] P.T. Williams, T.L. Dickson, S. Yin, Fracture analysis of vessels-Oak Ridge FAVOR, v 04. 1, computer code: theory and implementation of algorithms, methods, and correlations. NUREG/CR -6854, (2004).

DOI: 10.2172/1154649

[11] F.A. Simonen, S.R. Doctor, G.J. Schuster, P.G. Heasler, A generalized procedure for generating flaw-related inputs for the FAVOR code, NUREG/CR-6817, (2004).

[12] G. Qian, V.F. Gonzalez-Albuixech, M. Niffenegger, Probabilistic PTS analysis of a reactor pressure vessel by considering realistic crack distributions, Nucl. Eng. Des. 270 (2014) 312-24.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.062

[13] G. Qian, V.F. Gonzalez-Albuixech, M. Niffenegger, In-plane and out-of-plane constraint effects under pressurized thermal shocks, Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 (2014) 1311-21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.021

[14] G. Qian, M. Niffenegger, Integrity analysis of a reactor pressure vessel subjected to pressurized thermal shocks by considering constraint effect, Eng. Fract. Mech. 112-113 (2013) 14-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.09.009

[15] G. Qian, M. Niffenegger, Deterministic and probabilistic analysis of a reactor pressure vessel subjected to pressurized thermal shocks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 273 (2014) 381-395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.032

[16] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1. 154, Format and content of plant-specific pressurized thermal shock safety analysis reports for pressurized water reactors, (1987).

[17] R. Bonadé, P. Mueller, P. Spätig, Fracture toughness behavior in the ductile–brittle transition region of the tempered martensitic Eurofer97 steel: Experiments and modeling, Eng. Fract. Mech. 75 (2008) 3985–4000.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.016

[18] P. Mueller, P. Spätig, 3D Finite element and experimental study of the size requirements for measuring toughness on tempered martensitic steels, J. Nucl. Mater. 389 (2009) 377-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.311