The Strain-Based Failure Assessment Diagram for Commercially Pure Titanium TA2

Article Preview

Abstract:

Strain-based failure assessment methods have been usually used in recent years to propose the fitness-for-service flaws. In this paper, the stress-based and strain-based failure assessment diagram (SB-FAD) approaches were reviewed firstly. Then, SB-FAD approach was used to the material commercially pure titanium TA2 with high strain-hardening coefficient. Several failure assessment curves obtained from strain-based method for four typical specimens, i.e., CCP (center-cracked plate), DECP (double edge cracked plate), SECP (single edge cracked plate) and CT (compact tension) were proposed. It was found that the geometries and crack sizes had obvious effects on the failure assessment curves. By comparing with the stress-based failure assessment curves, the traditional strain-based failure assessment curves could lead to more conservatism in the stage after yielding. However, the SB-FAD modified by Ainsworth can be used.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

79-86

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] GB/T19624-2004: Safety Assessment for In-Service Pressure Vessels Containing defects (National Bureau of Standards, Beijing 2004). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] R6 Revision4: Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects (British Energy, Gloucester, UK, 2004), Amendment3, BEGL procedure, Final procedure.

Google Scholar

[3] SINTAP: Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry (British Steel Report, Rotherham 1999), Project BE95-1426.

Google Scholar

[4] BS7910: Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures (British Standards Publishing Limited 2005).

Google Scholar

[5] API579-1/ASME: Fitness-For-Service (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, USA 2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Budden P. J: Engng Fracture Mech, Vol. 73 (2006), p.537.

Google Scholar

[7] R.A. Ainsworth, P.J. Budden: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping (2012). Vol. 89, p.59.

Google Scholar

[8] P.J. Budden, M.C. Smith: Proc. ASME PVP2009, PVP2009-77377, (Prague, July 26-30, 2009).

Google Scholar

[9] R.A. Ansiworth: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping (British, UK 2001), Vol. 32, No. 1, p.3.

Google Scholar

[10] H.S. Wu, Q.P. Zhong: Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, Vol. 21 (2000) No. Z1, p.305. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Y.Q. Zhao: Journal of Aeronautical Materials, Vol. 34 (2014) No. 4, p.51. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] X.W. Chen, X.H. He and Q. Dai et al: Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, Vol. 42 (2013) No. 7, p.1469. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar