Annealing Effect on Titanium Dioxide Layer in Paired Hybrid Carbon Nanotubes - Graphene as Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Working Electrode

Article Preview

Abstract:

Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) layer was deposited on conductive transparent glass substrate (ITO glass) at room temperature using doctor blade method. The TiO2 layer was annealed at 450 °C, 550 °C and 650 °C in a vacuum chamber for 1 hour. The morphology and porosity of TiO2 after annealed at different temperatures were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Spectrum Parameter Analyzer (SPA). Photocatalytic activity at different annealing temperatures was measured for dye sensitized solar cell that was fabricated using the new in-house carbon nanotubes-graphene hybrid as the dye material. The results showed that, the optimum annealing temperature was 450 °C. At that temperature, the active photocatalytic activity, which was initiated by the anatase TiO2 formation in paired with hybrid system as the working electrode, has contributed to the highest conversion efficiency of 0.0016% of the device performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1191-1196

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Hamadanian, V. Jabbari, 5th SASTech 2011, Iran, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Gratzel, J. Sol-Gel Science and Tech, vol. 22, pp.7-13, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Kay, M. Gratzel, J. Phys. Chem, vol. 97, p.6272, (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] N.A.M. Ahmad Hambali, N. Roshidah, M. Norhafiz Hashim, I.S. Mohamad, N. Hidayah Saad, M.N. Norizan, Dye Sensitized Solar Cells using Natural Dyes as Sensitizers from Malaysia Local fruit Buah Mertajam, ICoMEIA (2014), In press.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4915768

Google Scholar

[5] H. Zhou, L. Wu, Y. Gao and T. Ma, J Photoch. Photobio. A: Chem. Vol. 219, 188-194 (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] M. S. Roy, P. Balraju, M. Kumar and G. D. Sharma, Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C vol. 92, 909-913 (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Qin, Q. Lioa, Y. Huang, L. Tang, X. Zhang,Y. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 22552-22663, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Plank, H.J. Snaith, C. Ducati, J.S. Bendall, L. Schmidt, M.E. Welland, vol. 19, 465603, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Sh. Nadzirah, U. Hashim, RSM 2013, Langkawi, (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] W. Shimizu, S. Nakamura, T. Sato, Y. Murakami, Langmuir, vol. 28 (33), pp.12245-55, (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] N. Biradar, V Ramesha, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 2, 416-419, (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Liu, P. Zhang, A. Li, F. Su, T. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Gong, Chem. Comm, vol. 49, pp.5817-5819, (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] M.Y. Yen, M.C. Hsiao, S.H. Liao, P.I. Liu, H.M. Tsai, C.C.M. Ma, N.W. Pu, M.D. Ger, Carbon. vol. 49, pp.3597-3606, (2011).

Google Scholar

[14] G.J. Yang, C.J. Liu, F. Han, X.C. Huang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. vol 22 (5), pp.2364-2368, (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Ohno, K. Tokieda, S. Higashida, M. Matsumura, Appl. Catal. A, vol. 224, p.383, (2003).

Google Scholar