Evaluation of Sludge Reduction Mechanisms in ‘Sonolysis-Cryptic Growth’ Wastewater Treatment System

Article Preview

Abstract:

‘Sonication - cryptic growth’ technology can reduce 30-80% excess sludge in wastewater treatment systems. Various mechanisms contribute to the sludge reduction but the role of each one is unclear. This paper quantitatively studied the potential mechanisms in ‘sonication - cryptic growth’. The operation condition was: every day 20% sludge was sonicated under 1.2 Wml-1 for 15 min and then returned to the wastewater treatment reactor for cryptic growth. The results showed that under such conditions, ‘sonication - cryptic growth’ reduced the excess sludge by 57.3% and the effluent met the national discharge standard. Multiple mechanisms were involved in the process. Detailed analysis showed that the ‘lysis-cryptic growth’ mechanism was the most important one and accounted for 49.1% of sludge reduction. Biodegradation of residual sludge was the second important one and contributed 19.5%. Other potential mechanisms included the altered microbial community, longer sludge retention time, and accumulation of persistent materials. But organic load increase had virtually no impact.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

108-115

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Friedler and E. Pisanty. Effects of design flow and treatment level on construction and operation costs of municipal sewage treatment plants and their implications on policy making. Water Research, 40(2006), pp.3751-3758.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.015

Google Scholar

[2] C. Grady , G. Daigger, H. Lim. Biological Sewage Treatment (2nd ed. )(1999). New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

Google Scholar

[3] S Saby, M Djater, G Chen. Feasibility of using a chlorination step to reduce excess sludge in activated sludge process. Water Research, 36(2002), pp.656-666.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00259-7

Google Scholar

[4] Y Wei, R Houten, A Borger, D Eikelboom, Y Fan. Minimization of excess sludge production for biological sewage treatment. Water Research, 37(2003), pp.4453-4467.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00441-x

Google Scholar

[5] S Yoon, H Kim, S Lee. Incorporation of ultrasonic cell disintegration into a membrane bioreactor for zero sludge production. Process Biochemisty, 39(2004), p.1923-(1929).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.023

Google Scholar

[6] H. Ødegaard. Sludge minimization technologies - an overview. Water Sci. Technol., 49 ( 2004), pp.31-40.

Google Scholar

[7] W Saktaymin, H Tsuno, H Soyama, J Weerapakkaroon. Advanced sewage treatment process with excess sludge reduction and phosphorus recovery. Water Research, 39(2005), pp.902-910.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.035

Google Scholar

[8] P Liang, X Huang, Y Qian, Y Wei, G Ding. Determination and comparison of sludge reduction rates caused by micro-faunas' predation. Bioresource Technology, 97(2006), pp.854-861.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.018

Google Scholar

[9] X. Guo, J. Liu, Y. Wei, L. Li. Sludge reduction with Tubificidae and the impact on the performance of the sewage treatment process. J. Env. Sci., 19(2007), pp.257-263.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Wang, J Sui, H S Shen, S K Liang, X He, M Zhang, Y Xie, L Li, Y Hu. Reduction of excess sludge production in sequencing batch reactor through incorporation of chlorine dioxide oxidation. J. Hazardous Materials, 192 ( 2011), p.93–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.099

Google Scholar

[11] J. Laurent, K. Jaziria, R. Guignard, M. Casellas, C. Dagot. Comprehensive insight of the performances of excess sludge reduction by 90 °C thermal treatment coupled with activated sludge at pilot scale: COD and N removal, bacterial populations, fate of heavy metals, Process Biochemistry, 46 ( 2011), p.1808.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.06.007

Google Scholar

[12] M Spérandio, E Paul, Y Bessière, Y Liu, Sludge Production: Quantification and Prediction for Urban Treatment Plants and Assessment of Strategies for Sludge Reduction, in Biological Sludge Minimization and Biomaterials/Bioenergy Recovery Technologies (eds E. Paul and Y. Liu), (2012), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, USA.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118309643.ch2

Google Scholar

[13] Keskesa S, Hassib Bouallagui, Jean Jacques Godon, Sami Abid, Moktar Hamdi. Biological sludge reduction during abattoir wastewater treatment process using a sequencing batch aerobic system. Environment Technology, 34(2013), pp.333-341.

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.696713

Google Scholar

[14] C. Chu, B. Chang, J. Liao, D. Jean, D. Lee. Observation on changes in ultrasonically treated waste-activated sludge. Water Research, 35(2001), pp.1038-1046.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00338-9

Google Scholar

[15] R. Dewil, J. Baeyens, R. Goutvrind. Ultrasonic treatment of waste activated sludge. Environmental Progress, 25(2006), pp.121-128.

DOI: 10.1002/ep.10130

Google Scholar

[16] G. Chen, K. An, S. Saby, E. Brois, M. Djafer, Possible Cause of Excess Sludge Reduction in an Oxic-Settling-Anaerobic Activated Sludge Process (OSA) Process. Water Research, 37(2003), pp.3855-3866.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00331-2

Google Scholar

[17] J. He, T. Wan, G. Zhang, J. Yang. Ultrasonic reduction of excess sludge from activated sludge system: energy efficiency improvement via operation optimization. Ultrasonics Sonochemisty, 18(2011), pp.99-103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.03.006

Google Scholar

[18] G Zhang, J He, P Zhang, J Yang. Ultrasonic reduction of excess sludge from activated sludge system II: urban wastewater treatment. J. Hazardous Materials, 164(2009), pp.1105-1109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.015

Google Scholar

[19] J W Lee, H Y Cha, K. Y Park, K G Song, K H Ahn. Operational strategies for an activated sludge process in conjunction with ozone oxidation for zero excess sludge production during winter season. Water Research, 39(2005), pp.1199-1204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.10.004

Google Scholar

[20] K. Jyoti and A. Pandit. Hybrid cavitation methods for water disinfection: simultaneous use of chemicals with cavitation, Ultrasonics Sonochemisty, 10(2003), pp.255-264.

DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4177(03)00095-6

Google Scholar

[21] Y. Liu. Bioenergetic interpretation on the So/Xo in substrate-sufficient batch culture. Water Research, 30(1996), pp.2766-2770.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00157-1

Google Scholar

[22] J F Wang, Q L Zhao, W B Jin, J K Lin. Mechanism on minimization of excess sludge in OSA process. Frontiers Env. Sci. Engr., 2(2008), pp.36-43.

Google Scholar

[23] E Neyens, J Baeyens, M Weemaes, B De heyder. Alkaline thermal sludge hydrolysis. J. Hazardous Material, 97(2003), pp.295-314.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00286-8

Google Scholar

[24] S H Yoon. Important operational parameters of membrane bioreactor-sludge disintegration (MBR-SD) system for zero excess sludge production. Water Research, 37(2003), p.1921-(1931).

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00578-x

Google Scholar