Fast Plastic Integration Algorithm for Damage Prediction in Forming Process Simulations

Article Preview

Abstract:

The iterative Return Mapping Algorithm (RMA) is widely used for the plastic integration owing to its accuracy and efficiency, but it is CPU time consuming and may cause divergence problems in case of large strain increments. This paper presents a fast plastic integration method called Direct Scalar Algorithm (DSA) for the damage prediction in forming process simulations. A simplified three-dimensional (3D) strain-based damage model is coupled with the plasticity and implemented into the DSA which does not need iterative solution to make the plastic integration very fast and robust even for very large strain increments. The basic idea is to transform the constitutive equations in terms of the unknown stress vectors into a scalar equation in terms of the equivalent stresses which can be determined by using the experimental tensile curve; thus, the plastic multiplier ∆λ can be directly calculated. The DSA is as accurate as RMA but much faster for the plastic integration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

342-349

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. C. Drucker, The significance of the criterion for additional plastic deformation of metals, J. Colloid Sci., Vol3, pp.299-311, (1949).

DOI: 10.1016/0095-8522(49)90011-2

Google Scholar

[2] J. C. Simo and T. J. R. Hughes, Computational Inelasticity, Springer-Verlag New York, (1998).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Rice and D. M. Tracey, Computational Fracture Mechanics, Num. and Comp. Meth. in Struct. Mech. (eds. S. J. Fenves et al. ), Academic Press, N.Y., pp.585-623, (1973).

Google Scholar

[4] J. C. Simo, R. L. Taylor, A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., Vol. 22, p.649–670, (1986).

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620220310

Google Scholar

[5] C. Robert, P. Dal Santo, A. Delamézière, A. Potiron, J. -L. Batoz, On some computational aspects for incremental sheet metal forming simulations, 11th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, 23-25 Avril 2008, Lyon, France, Int. J. Mater Form ISSN 1960-6214.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0155-4

Google Scholar

[6] J. Lemaitre, J. L. Chaboche, Mechanics of solid materials,. Cambridge University Press, UK, (1990).

Google Scholar

[7] Handbook of Damage Mechanics: Nano to Macro Scale for Materials and Structures, Edited by G. Z. Voyiadjis, ISBN 978-1-4614-5588-2, Springer, New York, (2015).

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Y. Zhu, S. Cescotto, A. M. Habraken, A fully coupled elastoplastic damage modeling and fracture criteria in metal forming processes,. J. Met. Process Technol., 32: 197–204, (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(92)90177-t

Google Scholar