Control of Uncertainty Based on Machining Strategies during Reaming

Sebastian Güth; Andreas Bretz; Christian Bölling; Andreas Baron; Eberhard Abele

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.807.162

Paper Titles

Orbital Forming of Flange Parts under Uncertainty
p.121

Data-Based Support in the Development of Press Systems Using the Example of Sheet Metal Forming
p.130

Proved Quality by Online Monitoring and Closed-Loop Control of Pin Insertion
p.140

Control of Uncertainty in High Precision Cutting Processes: Reaming of Valve Guides in a Cylinder Head of a Combustion Engine
p.153

Control of Uncertainty Based on Machining Strategies during Reaming
p.162

Uncertainty of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: Chemistry, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
p.169

Representation of Human Behaviour for the Visualization in Assembly Design
p.183

Analysis of the Effect of Uncertain Clamping Stiffness on the Dynamical Behaviour of Structures Using Interval Field Methods
p.195

Methodical Approaches to Describe and Evaluate Uncertainty in the Transmission Behavior of a Sensory Rod
p.205

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 807Control of Uncertainty Based on Machining...

Control of Uncertainty Based on Machining Strategies during Reaming

Abstract:

The bore quality is influenced by machine’s accuracy, work piece and tool errors as well as handling errors. This uncertainty has a huge impact on the quality of the finished bore. During reaming, the majority of tool deflection arises during the unsteady process phase. The entry phase is regarded as the biggest influencing factor for the reamer’s deflection with increasing bore depth. This paper examines the influence of various entry strategies on the bore quality during the reaming process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Uncertainty in Mechanical Engineering II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 807)

Pages:

162-168

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.807.162

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Sebastian Güth, Andreas Bretz*, Christian Bölling, Andreas Baron, Eberhard Abele

Keywords:

Machining Strategy, Reaming, Uncertainty

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] M. Krail, Reduktionspotenziale bei PKW, in: Alternative Antriebskonzepte bei sich wandelnden Mobilitätsstilen, KIT Scientific Publishing (2013) pp.147-164.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Hauer, Modellierung der Werkzeugabdrängung beim Reiben - Ableitung von Empfehlungen für die Gestaltung von Mehrschneidenreibahlen. Dissertation TU Darmstadt (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Hagedorn, K. Weinert, Schnittkraftmessung beim Reiben mit Mehrschneidenreibahlen, in: Werkstattstechnik online, Vol. 95 (2005) pp.485-489.

DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2005-6-485

Google Scholar

[4] K. Weinert, and D. Meister, Machining and tool wear, in: Production Engineering, Vol. II (1995) pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Schmalz, Reibahle für hohe Kreisformgenauigkeit, in: Werkstatt und Betrieb (1970) pp.313-318.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Kuenanz and R. Hilke, Hochpräzisionszerspanen mit geometrisch bestimmter Schneide, Band III Fräsen, Ausbohren und Reiben, Forschungsgemeinschaft Qualitätssicherung e. V., Frankfurt am Main, (1994) p.58 – 68.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Eifler, G.C. Enss, M. Haydn, L. Mosch, R. Platz, H. Hanselka, Approach for a consistent description of uncertainty in process chains of load carrying mechanical systems, in: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 104 (2011) pp.133-144.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.104.133

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Katz and A. Poustie, On the hole quality and drill wandering relationship, in: International Journal of Advanced Manufactoring Technology, Vol. 17 (2001) pp.233-237.

DOI: 10.1007/pl00003945

Google Scholar

[9] N.N. (2013). Siemens Sinumerik 840D - Programmierhandbuch Arbeitsvorbereitung. CNC Version 4. 5 SP2.

Google Scholar