Material Response Changes due to Varied Loadings in Three Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study presents the details of experimental and analytical investigations on three different types of composites on their progress to failure under varied type of loadings. The composites are glass/epoxy-GFRP, Kevlar/epoxy-KFRP and Carbon/epoxy-CFRP composites. A series of experiments were carried out to find the variation in mechanical properties in all composites due to displacement controlled tests with different displacement rates such as 0.5mm/min, 1.0 mm/min and 1.5mm/min. The experimental results for CFRP, GFRP and KFRP under three different zones of response viz., stage I- response upto design load-DL, stage II-later from design load to ultimate load-UL followed by Stage II-response upto failure load-FL were discussed. Comparisons of relative performance under different rates and types of damage occurred are discussed from strength, stiffness and energy points of view.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

185-189

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I.M. Daniel, B.T. Werner and J.S. Fenner, Strain-rate-dependent failure criteria for composites, Composites Science and Technology. 71 (2011) 357–364.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.028

Google Scholar

[2] J. L. V. Coelho and J. M. L. Reis, Effects of Strain Rate and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Gfrp Composites, Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering). 10 (2011) 03-06.

DOI: 10.5380/reterm.v10i1-2.61945

Google Scholar

[3] R. Velmurugan and S. Gurusideswar, Strain Rate Dependent Behavior of Glass/Nano Clay Filled Epoxy Resin Composite, Defence Science Journal. 64 (2014)295-302.

DOI: 10.14429/dsj.64.7331

Google Scholar

[4] Y.K. Boey and Y. W Kwon, Progressive damage and failure strength of notched woven fabric composites under axial loading with varying strain rates, Composite Structures. 96 (2013) 824–832.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.035

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Chen and S. Ghosh, Micromechanical analysis of strain rate-dependent deformation and failure in composite microstructures under dynamic loading conditions, International Journal of Plasticity. 32(2012) 218–247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.008

Google Scholar

[6] N. Taniguchi, T. Nishiwaki, N. Hirayama, H. Nishida and H. Kawada, Dynamic tensile properties of carbon fiber composite based on thermoplastic epoxy resin loaded in matrix-dominated directions, Composites Science and Technology. 69(2009) 207–213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.002

Google Scholar

[7] J. L. Puente and S. Li, Analysis of strain rate sensitivity of carbon/epoxy woven composites, International Journal of Impact Engineering. 48 (2012) 54-64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.05.008

Google Scholar

[8] ATSB Transport Safety Research Report, Fibre Composite Aircraft – Capability and Safety, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] R.O. Ochola, K. Marcus, G.N. Nurick and T. Franz. Mechanical behaviour of glass and carbon fibre reinforced composites at varying strain rates, Composite Structures. 63(2004)455–67.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00194-6

Google Scholar

[10] J.R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, Normal error Integral, University Science Books, (1997) pp.285-289.

Google Scholar