The Effect of Different Reduction Methods on Conductivity of Reduced-Graphene Oxide (r-GO)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Large quantity of graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by Modified Hummer’s method, in which graphite was treated with a mixture of sulphuric acid, potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide. A chemically reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) was prepared using sodium borohydride (NaBH4), followed by thermal treatment and thermal treatment of chemically reduce using NaBH4. The electrical resistance of r-GO was measured using Keithley sourcemeter. The results revealed that r-GO show lower resistance on thermal reduction which is 2.39 kΩ compared to chemical reduction and thermal of NaBH4 reduction which is 2.18 MΩ and 3.16 kΩ respectively. It can be concluded that thermal reduction is the best method to produce high conductivity r-GO film.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

216-220

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Xu, R. Yuan, and X. Wang, vol. 29, no. 1, p.61–66, (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] Mathkar A, Tozier D, Cox P, et al. Controlled, stepwise reduction and band gap manipulation of graphene oxide [J]. J Phys Chem Lett, 2012, 3(8 ): 986-991.

DOI: 10.1021/jz300096t

Google Scholar

[3] S. Pei and H. Cheng, The reduction of graphene oxide, Carbon N. Y., vol. 50, no. 9, p.3210–3228, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] F. Liu, Y. Cao, M. Yi, L. Xie, W. Huang, N. Tang, W. Zhong, and Y. Du, Thermostability, Photoluminescence, and Electrical Properties of Reduced Graphene Oxide–Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Materials, p.28–37, (2013).

DOI: 10.3390/cryst3010028

Google Scholar

[5] Yeh T F, Chan F F, Hsieh CT, et al. Graphite oxide with different oxygenated levels for hydrogen and oxygen production from water under illumination: The band positions of graphite oxide [J]. J Phys Chem C, 2011, 115(45): 22587-22597.

DOI: 10.1021/jp204856c

Google Scholar

[6] Mathkar A, Tozier D, Cox P, et al. Controlled, stepwise reduction and band gap manipulation of graphene oxide [J]. J Phys Chem Lett, 2012, 3(8): 986-991.

DOI: 10.1021/jz300096t

Google Scholar

[7] Qiu L, Zhang X H, Yang W R, et al. Controllable corrugation of chemically converted graphene sheets in water and potential application for nanofiltration [J]. Chem Commun, 2011, 47(6): 5810-5812.

DOI: 10.1039/c1cc10720h

Google Scholar

[8] T. Ghosh and W. Oh, J p s 3(1), vol. 3, no. June, p.17–23, (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] W. Chen and L. Yan, Preparation of graphene by a low-temperature thermal reduction at atmosphere pressure., Nanoscale, vol. 2, p.559–563, (2010).

DOI: 10.1039/b9nr00191c

Google Scholar

[10] Dreyer D R, Park S, Bielawski C W, et al. The chemistry of graphene oxide [J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2010, 39(1): 228-240.

DOI: 10.1039/b917103g

Google Scholar

[11] B. H. Shin, K. K. Kim, A. Benayad, S. Yoon, K. Park, I. Jung, M. H. Jin, H. Jeong, J. M. Kim, J. Choi, and Y. H. Lee, Efficient Reduction of Graphite Oxide by Sodium Borohydride and Its Effect on Electrical Conductance, p.1987–1992, (2009).

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200900167

Google Scholar