Correlation of Impact Energy from Instrumented Charpy Impact

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes the correlation of absorbed energy with calculated energy using the power spectrum density (PSD) method. The total absorbed energy was obtained using the dial/encoder system may significantly vary depending on the strength and ductility of the material. In addition, according to ASTM E23, over 80% of absorbed energy is inaccurate and approximate. For this reason, we determined the energy collected from the dial/encoder Charpy impact test using the signal processing approach. Strain gauges were connected to the Charpy impact striker and the high frequency data acquisition system in order to capture the dynamic impact strain response. Specimens of an aluminium alloy of 6061-T6 and carbon steel 1050 with different velocities and thicknesses were used in the experiment. The specimens are prepared based on the ASTM E23. A collection of signal was converted from the time domain to the frequency domain by means of PSD method and the area under its plot was used to calculate strain energy. The comparison between energy absorbed during the experiment with PSD peak and the strain energy were performed using different materials, velocities and thicknesses. The total energy absorbed for both material with the PSD peak and the strain energy using the dial/encoder system can be linked by a power law equation with R2 96% and R2 94 %. Thus, the effects of the strain signal pattern and impact duration with different parameters were correlated with the PSD peak and the strain energy. This correlation using PSD can be used as an alternative for the charpy impact test and solve the problem of inaccurate absorbed energy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

221-226

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Sahraoui, J.L. Laitailate: Fracture Mechanics Vol. 60(4) (1998), pp.437-446.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Rittel, A. Pineau, J. Clisson and L. Rota: On Testing of Charpy Specimens using the one point Bend Impact Technique, Centre Technique de l'Armement Cedex France (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02410979

Google Scholar

[3] A. Rossoll, C. Berdin and C. Prioul: Int. J. of Fracture Vol. 115(2002), pp.205-226.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1016323522441

Google Scholar

[4] E.A. Kondryakov, V.N. Zhmaka, V.V. Kharchenko, A. I Babutskii and S.V. Romanov: Strength of Materials Vol 37 (2005), p.3.

DOI: 10.1007/s11223-005-0046-6

Google Scholar

[5] D. Francois and A. Pineau: Observations on Differences between the energy determined using an instrumented striker and Dial/Encorder Energy, From Charpy to Present Impact Testing, (9 edition), Elsevier Science Ltd. and ESIS (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(02)80025-5

Google Scholar

[6] M.P. Sr Manahan and R. B Stonesifer: The Difference between Total Absorbed Energy Measured Using An Instrumented Striker and that Obtained an Optical Encoder, Pendulum Impact Testing: A Century of Progress, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken PA (2000).

DOI: 10.1520/stp14394s

Google Scholar

[7] S. Xu, R. Bouchard and W. R. Tyson : Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 34(3) (2006), pp.176-180.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Kutz: Handbook of Materials Selection (John Wiley & Sons, New York 2002).

Google Scholar

[9] R.C. Hibbeler: Mechanics of Materials 7 Edition (Prentice Hall, Singapore 2008).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Shterenlikht, S.H. Hashemi, J.R. Yates, I.C. Howard and R.M. Andrews: Int. J. of Fracture, Vol. 132 (2005), pp.81-97.

Google Scholar

[11] S.L. Ouk and K.H. Seong: KSME Int. Journal, Vol. 11(5) (1997), pp.513-520.

Google Scholar

[12] International Standard Metallic Materials part 1, 2 and 3: Charpy Pendulum Impact Test, Department of Standards Malaysia. (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] I.M. Daniel, J.L. Abot, P.M. Schubel and J.J. Lou: Experimental Mechanics (2011), doi: 10. 1007/s11340-011-9479-y.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Z Nuawi: Pembangunan system pemantauan keadaan perkakas mesin menggunakan kaedah isyarat ultrasonic bawaan udara (Department of Mechanical and Materials, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2007).

Google Scholar

[15] Li. Xiaoli and A. M. Bassiuny: International Journal of Machine Tool & Manufacture, Vol. 48(2008), pp.576-588.

Google Scholar

[16] D Francois and A Pineau: Studies toward Optimum Instrumented Striker Design From Charpy to Present Impact Testing, (9 Edition), Elsevier Science Ltd. and ESIS (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(02)80024-3

Google Scholar

[17] M. P. Sr Manahan and R. B. Stonesifer: European Structural Integrity Society, 30 (C), 221-228. (2002).

Google Scholar