Compression Characterization of Polyurethane Foams with Different Formulations of Polyol and MDI

Sinar Arzuria Adnan; Firuz Zainuddin; Hazizan Md. Akil; Sahrim Hj Ahmad

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.815.74

Paper Titles

Effect of Recycled Nitrile Glove (rNBRg) Particle Sizes on Curing Characteristics and Physical Properties of Natural Rubber/Styrene Butadiene Rubber/Recycled Nitrile Glove (NR/SBR/rNBRg) Blends
p.54

The Effects of Trans-Polyoctylene Rubber (TOR) on the Properties of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber/Recycled Natural Latex Gloves (NBR/NRL-G) Compounds
p.59

Physical and Mechanical Behaviors of SnCu-Based Lead-Free Solder Alloys with an Addition of Aluminium
p.64

The Properties of Linear Low Density Polyethylene/Cyperus Odoratus (LLDPE/CY) Blends: Effect of Sodium Hydroxide
p.69

Compression Characterization of Polyurethane Foams with Different Formulations of Polyol and MDI
p.74

Effect of Heat Treatment on Hardness Behavior of AZ91 and AZ91 Reinforced Carbon Nanotube
p.79

Properties of Cement-Based Material Consisting Shredded Rubber as Drainage Material
p.84

Study of Covalent/Ionic Cross-Linked Modification on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Chitosan Film as Potential Material in Medical Application
p.89

The Effects of Composition on Solid State Sintering of Tungsten-Brass Composites
p.94

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 815Compression Characterization of Polyurethane Foams...

Compression Characterization of Polyurethane Foams with Different Formulations of Polyol and MDI

Abstract:

Rigid polyurethane (PU) foams were prepared with palm oil based polyols (POP) and methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in order to archieve rigid formulations. The effect of the different amount of MDI (1 wt.%, 1.1 wt.% and 2 wt.%) were studied in density, compressive strength and energy absorption. It was found that the higher compressive strength of the PU foams showed at 1.604 MPa whereas the amount of MDI increased to 1.1 wt. %. The increased amount of MDI to 2 wt.% showed the higher value in density (0.0531 kg/m³) and energy absorption with 46.490 J for 70 % displacement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Design and Development of Sustainable Manufacturing Systems

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 815)

Pages:

74-78

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.815.74

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Sinar Arzuria Adnan, Firuz Zainuddin, Hazizan Md. Akil, Sahrim Hj Ahmad

Keywords:

Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate, Polyol, Polyurethane Foams

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] H. Mahfuz, V.K. Rangari, M.S. Islam and S. Jeelani: Composites Part A 35 (2004), pp.453-460.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Liang and S.Q. Shi: Key Engineering Materials Vols. 419-420 (2010), pp.477-480.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kumar and R. Kaur: IJSRR 2013, 2(1) Special Issue April-May (2013), pp.29-42.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Wang, L. Zhang, D. Li, J. Yin, S. Wu and Z. Mao: Bioresource Technology 99 (2008), pp.2265-2268.

Google Scholar

[5] A.B. Frances and M.V. N. Banon: Materials Science and Engineering 64 (2014) 012020.

Google Scholar

[6] N.S. Parsons, M.H.W. Lam, S.E. Hamilton and F. Hui: Science and Justice 50 (2010), pp.177-181.

Google Scholar

[7] C.S. Lee, T.L. Ooi, C.H. Chuah and S. Ahmad: J Am Oil Chem 84 (2007), pp.1161-1167.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Chuayjuljit and T. Sangpakdee: Metals, Materials and Minerals. Vol 17 (2007), pp.17-23.

Google Scholar

[9] R.R. Vuppalapati, V.G.K. Menta and K. Chandrashekhara: SAMPE Conference (2011), pp.23-26.

Google Scholar

[10] S.H. Yoo, S.H. Chang and M.P.F. Sutcliffe: Composites Part A 41 (2010), pp.427-434.

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Nur Azni, A.A. Sinar, Z. Firuz and A.G. Supri: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 925 (2014), pp.268-272.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.925.268

Google Scholar

[12] F. Zainuddin, S. Ahmad, R. Rasid and S.N.F.S. Adam: Colloquium on Materials, Minerals and Polymers (2007), pp.251-252.

Google Scholar

[13] A.A.A. Hakim, M. Nassar, A. Emam and M. Sultan: Materials Chemistry and Physics 129 (2011), pp.301-307.

Google Scholar

[14] B.D.S. Orozco, M.V. Alonso, M. Oliet, J.C. Dominguez and F. Rodriguez: Composites Part B 56 (2014), pp.546-552.

Google Scholar

[15] E. Linul, D.A. Serban, T. Voiconi, L. Marsavina and T. Sadowski: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 601 (2014), pp.246-249.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.601.246

Google Scholar