Ageing Documentation of Hydrophilic Mineral Wool Used in Green Roof Assemblies

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper deals with mineral wool´s technical parameters evolution in varied time of their life cycle. Hydrophilic mineral wool can be used for a major or a partial substitution of a roof substrate. It can hold rainwater especially for a roof plants when an abundance of this water can be easily drained. Some of the technical parameters do not change in time, but others can differ. This change could be up to the half of their nominal declared values, measured just after the factory production. The aim of this paper is to point out that designing with only factory product data could be at variance with reality and may cause malfunction of green roof, severally when using hydrophilic mineral wool.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

397-401

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Games, J. H. Thomas, Agricultural application of glass wool, US Patent 2192939 A. (1940).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Kummermehr, L. Bihy, Sheet of mineral wool for sustaining vegetation on roofs, European Patent EP0670669 B1, Proprietor: Isover Saint-Gobain. (1997).

Google Scholar

[3] FLL, Guidelines for the Planning, Construction and Maintenance of Green Roofing, The Landscape Development and Landscaping Research Society e. V. (FLL), Bonn, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] F. Stazi, F. Tittarelli, G. Politi, C. Di Perna, P. Munafò, Assessment of the actual hygrothermal performance of glass mineral wool insulation applied 25 years ago in masonry cavity walls, Energ. Build. 68(A) (2014) 292-304.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.032

Google Scholar

[5] ČSN EN 826, Thermal insulating products for building applications - Determination of compression behaviour, Czech Office for Standards, Metrology and Testing, Prague, (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] CSI a. s., Test protocol no. 2253, Centre of building engineeering, a. s., Prague, (2014).

Google Scholar

[7] Information on http: / http: /www. optigreen. de/ (last access 9th Sept. 2015).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Volder, B. Dvorak, Event size, substrate water content and vegetation affect storm water retention efficiency of an un-irrigated extensive green roof system in Central Texas, Sustain. Cities Soc. 10 (2014) 59-64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.05.005

Google Scholar

[9] A.J. Bates, J.P. Sadler, R.B. Greswell, R. Mackay, Effects of recycled aggregate growth substrate on green roof vegetation development: A six year experiment, Landscape Urban Plan. 135 (2015) 22-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.010

Google Scholar

[10] P. Simon, S. Virginia, B. Christian, Parameters influencing the regeneration of a green roof's retention capacity via evapotranspiration, J. Hydr. 523 (2015), 356-367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.002

Google Scholar

[11] UNMZ, Thermal insulation products for buildings - Factory made mineral wool (MW) products – Specification (ČSN EN 13162 ed. 2), Czech Office for Standards, Metrology and Testing, Prague, (2013).

DOI: 10.3403/30169532

Google Scholar