A Real Options-Based Framework for Strategic Decision-Making in Hostile, Turbulent and Ultra-Volatile Environments

Abstract:

The resources required by modern military action are essential in establishing a favorable force balance and thus become a critical landmark in strategic decision making. The imbalance in resources is of utmost importance and needs to be analyzed in full relation with the current dynamic and volatile environment. Decisions made based on such resource dynamics are rapid, intuitive and can be easily transferred into practical approaches provided that the complexity of the processes characteristic of combat environments is fully taken into account. Moreover, the dynamic management of portfolios needs to also include options. Additionally, strategic decisions must be harmonized with operational and tactical decisions while integrating all available means by which to employ resources and meeting the deadline set by the features of real time situations. Traditional approaches like discounted cash flow/ net present value (DCF/ NPV) cannot provide the flexibility required by the changes in combat environment. Unlike the financial options focused on bonds, stocks, financial rates, military real options (MRO) evaluate military resources and bonds and are thus advantageous under uncertain and ultra-volatile conditions. Thus, strategic decision makers need to not only deter against losses, but to also understand how to preserve the opportunity to act in turbulent times.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 841)
• Pages: 323-329
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.841.323
• Online since: June 2016
• Authors: Mircea Boşcoianu, Laura Bacali, Elena Corina Boscoianu, Dragos Popa, Aura Codreanu
• Keywords: Dynamic Capabilities (DC), Military Real Options (MRO), Portfolio of Military Real Options (PMRO), Resource Based View (RBV), Strategic Decision Making (SDM)

References

[1] Barney, J.B., Is the resource- based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes, Academy of Management Review vol 26, (2001).

DOI: 10.2307/259393

[2] Bodie, Z., Investment and portfolio management, NY (2001).

[3] Boscoianu, M., Cioaca, C., Vladareanu, V., Boscoianu, E.C., An active support investment for innovation in deep uncertainty- the strategic management ingredients in robotics and mechatronics, Procedia Computer Science 12/ (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.112

[4] Cioaca, C., Constantinescu C. G, Boscoianu, M., Lile, R., Extreme risk assessment methodology (ERAM) in aviation systems, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal , June (2015).

DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2015.152

[5] Helfat C., Peteraf, M., The dynamic resource based view: capability lifecycle, Strategic management Journal 24, (2003).

DOI: 10.1002/smj.332

[6] Krychowski, C., Real options and strategic investment decisions: can they be used of scholars?, Academy of Management Perspectives, May (2010).

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2010.51827776

[7] Luehrman, T.A., Strategy as a portfolio of real options, Harvard Business Rev (1998).

[8] Miller, K.D., Scenarios, real options and integrated risk management, Long Range Planning, (2004).

[9] Smith, Managing a portfolio of real options: sequential exploration of dependent prospects, CEEPR.

[10] Taleb, N.N., Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder, Curtea Veche, (2014).

[11] Taleb, N.N., Fooled by randomness, Texere, New York, (2001).

[12] Teece, D. J, Dynamic capabilities, (2009).

[13] Teece, D. J, Pisano, G, Shuen A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic management Journal 18, (1997).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z