Structural Performance Evaluation with Pushover Analysis Case Study: The Integrated Central Surgery Building, Bethesda Hospital in Yogyakarta

Abstract:

The Earthquake causes damage to buildings and casualties. Design of buildings against earthquake loads is very important so during an earthquake the building does not collapse and no casualties. Especially for important buildings like the Ingrated Central Surgery Building or Gedung Bedah Sentral Terpadu (GBST) Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta is expected to keep functioning and have not experienced significant damage after the earthquake. In performance based design, level of performance for hospital buildings is lmmediate Occupancy (IO). The purpose of this research is to know actually performance level of the structure GBST Bethesda Hospital in Yogyakarta. Evaluation method use is non-linear static analysis (Pushover). The lateral load determining by static equivalent analisys, the lateral load given monotonic in one direction step by step. Performance level determine in Capacity Spectrume Method according Applied Technologi Council (ATC 40,1996) the result is performance point and displacement targets method according Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 356,2000). Structure performance level specified by drift ratio required by ATC 40 (1996). The result of evaluation according ATC 40 (1996) in the X direction obtained value of displacement at 0.174m, in the direction Y at 0.185m while the according FEMA 356 (2000) the displacement in direction X at 0.137m and Y direction at 0.179m. The value of drift ratio actual is less than 1% so the performance level for earthquake return period of 2500 years is the Immediate Occupancy.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 845)
• Pages: 265-273
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.845.265
• Online since: July 2016
• Authors: Edy Purwanto*, Agus Supriyadi, Masbudi Masbudi
• Keywords: Capacity Spectrume Method, Displacement Method, Drift Ratio, Performance Level, Performance Point, Pushover

References

[1] ATC 40, 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technologi Council, Redwood City, California.

[2] Boediono, Prof. Dr. Ir. Bambang, Augusts 2008, Short Course HAKI- Performance Based Design, Jakarta.

[3] Dewobroto, W. 2006. Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Steel Building with SAP2000. Department of Civil Engineering – Pelita Harapan University. Journal Of Civil Engineering, Vol. 3.

[4] FEMA 310, 1998, Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA.

[5] FEMA 356, 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C.

[6] SNI 1726-2012, Earthquake Standards Design for Structural Building and Non Structural Building. National Standardization Agency.