Optimization in Indonesia’s Bridge Preventive Maintenance Programme: A Proposal

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes optimisation method for the bridge preventive maintenance programme. The main focus is to predict the optimum preventive maintenance period of time - or, interval - so that bridges could be maintained better. A mathematical model has been developed in this study and is approached using the Markov Chain. Other optimisation techniques will also be discussed here and the reason for selecting the Markov Chain other than other current optimisation techniques is presented as well in a convincing argument. Development of software to help apply the devised mathematical model is in-progress and is clearly discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

299-304

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing Republic of Indonesia, 2013 Statistical Information Book, The Author, Jakarta, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] S.Y. Ok, S.Y. Lee and W. Park, Robust multi-objective maintenance planning of deteriorating bridges against uncertainty in performance model, Advances in Engineering Software 65 (2013) 32-42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.05.009

Google Scholar

[3] M. Liu and D.M. Frangopol, Multi-objective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety and life-cycle cost, J. Struct. Eng. 131 Vol. 5 (2005) 833-842.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2005)131:5(833)

Google Scholar

[4] D.M. Frangopol, K.Y. Lin and A.C. Estes, Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures, J. Struct. Eng. 123 Vol. 10 (1997) 1390-1401.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1390)

Google Scholar

[5] D.M. Frangopol, M.P. Enright, E. Gharaibeh and A.C. Estes, Towards optimal reliability-based bridge maintenance planning: Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructures system, ASCE, Reston VA, (1999).

DOI: 10.1061/40492(2000)21

Google Scholar

[6] M. Liu, A. Hammad and Y. Itoh, Multi-objective optimization of bridge deck rehabilitation using a genetic algorithm, Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (1997) 431-443.

DOI: 10.1111/0885-9507.00075

Google Scholar

[7] A. Miyamoto, K. Kawamura and H. Nakamura, Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges, Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (2000) 45-55.

DOI: 10.1111/0885-9507.00170

Google Scholar

[8] H. Futura, T. Kameda, Y. Fukuda and D.M. Frangopol, Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure system: life-cycle cost vs. service level, ASCE, Reston VA, (2003).

DOI: 10.1061/40707(240)3

Google Scholar

[9] M. Liu and D.M. Frangopol, Bridge annual maintenance prioritization under uncertainty by multi-objective combinatorial optimization, Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 20 (2005) 343-353.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00401.x

Google Scholar

[10] S.Y. Lee, S.Y. Ok, W. Park and H.M. Koh, Preference-based maintenance planning for deteriorating bridges under multi-objective optimization framework, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 Vol. 7-8 (2011) 633-644.

DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2010.501565

Google Scholar

[11] W.T. Scherer and D.M. Glagola, Markovian models for bridge maintenance management, Journal of Transportation Engineering 120 Vol. 1 (1994) 37-51.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1994)120:1(37)

Google Scholar

[12] G. Morcous, Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov Chains, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 Vol. 2 (2006) 146-155.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2006)20:2(146)

Google Scholar

[13] A. Doyle and B.F. Rabun, Bridges Structures Maintenance Plan, LRFD, Boston, (2013).

Google Scholar

[14] D. Kececioglu, Reliability Engineering Handbook, Prentice Hall, Colorado, (1991).

Google Scholar

[15] Y.H. Huang and H.Y. Huang, A model for concurrent maintenance of bridge elements, Automation in Construction, (2011) 74-80.

Google Scholar