Minimizing Energy Consumption in Wireless Sensor Networks by Partition

Article Preview

Abstract:

In wireless sensor networks, clustering class routing protocol is an important protocol type. Different clustering methods, and cluster head selection method directly affects the energy consumption of the entire network communication. This paper studies the effect of different partition methods of the network energy consumption, and to study the partitioning methods under the conditions of uneven distribution of nodes. We believe that energy efficiency clustering method should adapt the distributed of sensor nodes in order to improve energy efficiency. And according to the partition method we propose a low-power adaptive clustering routing protocol based on node distribution to partition. The protocol can effectively extend the lifetime of a wireless sensor network. Simulation results show that the proposed protocol can effectively prolong the network lifetime.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

23-29

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M Younis, M Youssef, K Arisha. Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, 2002. MASCOTS 2002. Proceedings. 10th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 129-136(2002).

DOI: 10.1109/mascot.2002.1167054

Google Scholar

[2] R Wang, G Liu, C Zheng. Mechatronics and Automation, 2007. ICMA 2007. International Conference on. IEEE, 372-376(2007).

Google Scholar

[3] S Cheng, T Chang. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 9427-9434(2012).

Google Scholar

[4] I F Akyildiz, W Su, Y Sankarasubramaniam, et al. Computer networks, 38(4), 393-422(2002).

Google Scholar

[5] J N Al-Karaki, R Ul-Mustafa, A E Kamal. High Performance Switching and Routing, 2004. HPSR. 2004 Workshop on. IEEE, 241-245(2004).

DOI: 10.1109/hpsr.2004.1303478

Google Scholar

[6] A Manjeshwar, D P Agrawal. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International. IEEE Computer Society, 3, 30189a(2001).

Google Scholar

[7] O Younis, S Fahmy. Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 3(4), 366-379(2004).

Google Scholar

[8] S Lindsey, C S Raghavendra. Aerospace conference proceedings, 2002. IEEE. IEEE, 3, 3-1125(2002).

Google Scholar

[9] M Cardei, D Du. Wireless Networks, 11(3), 333-340(2005).

Google Scholar

[10] J Chang, L Tassiulas. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 12(4), 609-619(2004).

Google Scholar

[11] Y Chen, Q Zhao. Communications Letters, IEEE, 9(11), 976-978(2005).

Google Scholar

[12] M Ye, C Li, G Chen, et al. Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, 2005. IPCCC 2005. 24th IEEE International. IEEE, 535-540(2005).

DOI: 10.1109/pccc.2005.1460363

Google Scholar

[13] W R Heinzelman, A Chandrakasan, H Balakrishnan. System Sciences, 2000. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 10-12(2000).

Google Scholar

[14] L I Qiu-Luan, G H Zhan, L I Zhi-Hua. Transducer & Microsystem Technologies, (2014).

Google Scholar

[15] W Yi, Z Deyun, L Taotao. Journal of XI'AN Jiaotong University, 42(4), 389-394(2008).

Google Scholar

[16] Y Sun, J Peng, T Liu, et al. Journal on Communications, 35(1), 198-206(2014).

Google Scholar

[17] C Jiang, W Shi, X Tang, et al. Journal of Software, 23(5), 1222-1232(2012).

Google Scholar

[18] H Hu, F Zhang. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 19(2), 477-480(2006).

Google Scholar

[19] J F Xu, F Xu, Q L Meng. Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publ, 644, 2707-2710(2014).

Google Scholar