An Implementation of Analytical Boundary Simulation on Feedrate Scheduling during Semi-Finish Milling

Article Preview

Abstract:

In five-axis milling, determining the continuously changing Cutter Workpiece Engagement (CWE) remains a challenge. All the feedrate calculation method that have been reported need a precise information about Cutter Workpiece Engagement. In this paper, the cut geometry was calculated using an analytical method called Analytical Boundary Simulation (ABS). This method was reported accurate and less expensive in term of calculation time. The cut geometry data was then used to calculate the instantaneous cutting forces. A new mechanistic force model was developed by taken into account the variation of axial depth of cut, the feedrate, the tool orientation, and the helical angle. Analytical boundary simulation and mechanisitic cutting force model were then used to optimize a semi finish machining process using feedrate scheduling. The applicability of the proposed method was verified experimentally and the result show that the calculated cutting forces of feedrate scheduling have a good agreement with those obtained from the experimental work.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

211-215

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. W. L. Ip, H. C. W. Lau, F. T. S. Chan, An economical sculptured surface machining approach using fuzzy models and ball-nosed cutters. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 138 (2003) 579–585.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00149-3

Google Scholar

[2] T. S. Lan, K. S. Hsu, he implementation of optimum MRR on digital PC-based lathe system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35 (2007) 248–254.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0729-6

Google Scholar

[3] J. Chen, Y. Huang, M. Chen, Feedrate optimization and tool profile modification for the high-efficiency ball-end milling process, Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 45 (2005) 1070–1076.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.020

Google Scholar

[4] J. Kloypayan, Y. S. Lee. Adaptive federate scheduling and material engagement analysis for high performance machining. Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, (2002).

DOI: 10.1115/imece2002-33615

Google Scholar

[5] B. U. Guzel, I. Lazoglu, Increasing productivity in sculpture surface machining via off-line piecewise variable feedrate scheduling based on the force system model, Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 44 (2004) 21–28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.08.014

Google Scholar

[6] L. Q. Zhang, J. C. Feng, Y. H. Wang, M. Chen, Feedrate scheduling strategy for free-form surface machining through an integrated geometric and mechanistic model, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 40 (2009) 1191–1201.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1424-6

Google Scholar

[7] H. Erdim, I. Lazoglu, B. Ozturk, Feedrate scheduling strategies for free-form surfaces, Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf. 46 (2006) 747–757.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.036

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Liang, J. Ren, D. Zhang, X. Li, J. Zhou, Mechanics-based feedrate scheduling for multi-axis plunge milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79 (2015) 123-133.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-6807-x

Google Scholar

[9] G. Kiswanto, H. Hendriko, E. Duc, A hybrid analytical and discrete based methodology for determining cutter workpiece engagement in five axis milling. Int. J. adv. Manuf. Technol. 80 (2015) 2083-(2096).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7156-5

Google Scholar

[10] H. Hendriko, Mathematical model for chip geometry calculation in five-axis milling. J. Technol. 77(23) (2015) 107-112.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v77.6701

Google Scholar

[11] G. Kiswanto, H. Hendriko, E. Duc, An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling. Comput. Aided Des. 55 (2014) 81-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.003

Google Scholar

[12] K. Weinert, S. Du, P. Damm, M. Stautner, Swept volume generation for the simulation of machining processes, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 44 (2004) 617-628.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[13] S. Du, T. Surmann, O. Webber, K. Weinert, Formulationg swept profile for five-axis tool motions, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 45 (2005) 849-861.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.006

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Altintas, Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. Cambridge University Press (2000).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511843723

Google Scholar