Experimental Prediction and Numerical Modeling of Ductile Damage and Failure Modeling of Aluminium Sheet Metal Specimen

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminium sheet metal is nowadays used to fabricate lighter, crashworthy, fuel efficient and environment friendly vehicles. Ductile damage of sheet metals affects significantly the crashworthiness, as it naturally exhibits anisotropic behavior due to the grain orientation. Johnson-Cook (J-C) damage model is widely used in numerical simulation for assessing the failure modeling of crash component in particular at high strain rate. The Johnson-Cook material model available in literature is meant for isotropic material behavior which cannot be used directly for anisotropic behavior of materials. To characterize the plastic anisotropy of the rolled sheet, the modified Johnson-Cook material model should be developed. In this research the combination of experimental work and numerical analysis with clear and simpler calibration strategy for damage model is demonstrated. It aims to reduce laboratory tests using advanced numerical analysis to predict failure in order to save overall cost and development time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

369-374

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Totten G E, Mackenzie D S, Handbook of Aluminum: Physical metallurgy and processes M. Vol. 1 Boca Ration: CRC Press, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] A.A.A. Alghamdi, Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an Overview, Thin-Walled Struct. (2001) 189–213.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(00)00048-3

Google Scholar

[3] Reid, S. R. Plastic deformation mechanisms in axially compressed metal tubes used as impact energy absorbers. Int. J. of Mech Sci, 35. 12 (1993): 1035-1052.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(93)90054-x

Google Scholar

[4] Reza esmaeilizadeh, Kourosh khalili, Bagher mohammad sadeghi, Hossein Arabi, Simulated and experimental investigation of stretch sheet forming of commercial AA1200 aluminum alloy, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (2014) 484−490.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(14)63086-7

Google Scholar

[5] Bakhshi-Jooybari M., The study of spring-back of CK67 steel sheet in V-die and U-die bending processes, Materials and Design, Mater. Des. (2009) 2410-2419.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.018

Google Scholar

[6] A. Jaamialahmadi, M. Kadkhodayan, An Investigation into the Prediction of Forming Limit Diagrams for Normal Anisotropic Material Based on Bifurcation Analysis, J. Appl. Mech. (2011) 1-10.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4003351

Google Scholar

[7] Vial. C, Hosford, W. F and Caddell, R. M, Yield Loci of anisotropic sheet metals, Int. J. of Mech. Sci. (1983) 899-915.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(83)90020-6

Google Scholar

[8] Aleksandrovic S, stefanovic M, adamovic D, lazic V. Variation of normal anisotropy ratio r, during plastic forming. J. of Mech. Engg., (2009) 392−399.

Google Scholar

[9] Nagel, Gregory M., and David P. Thambiratnam. Dynamic simulation and energy absorption of tapered thin-walled tubes under oblique impact loading. Int. J. of Impact Eng. 32. 10 (2006) 1595-1620.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.002

Google Scholar

[10] El Amri, Abdelouahid, Numerical simulation of damage evolution and mechanical properties for ductile materials. S31 Modeles, Etudes de cas (2015).

Google Scholar

[11] F. Grytten a, T. Borvik, O.S. Hopperstad, M. Langseth, Low velocity perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates, Int. J. of Impact Eng. (2009) 597–610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.09.002

Google Scholar

[12] Abaqus, Reference Manual v 6. 14, Abaqus Inc., (2014).

Google Scholar