Mechanical Behavior and Fatigue Performance of Carburized Steel Specimens

Article Preview

Abstract:

Carburization is popular in design and fabrication of mechanical parts, such as gears, to improve fatigue performance. However, it is still open how to characterize the mechanical property of carburized steel and to quantify effects of the carburization to fatigue life of carburized parts. In the present paper four types of specimens differently treated and carburized are experimentally investigated. The experiments confirm significant increments in hardness and yield stress due to carburization. The fracture strain of the carburized steel is significantly smaller than that of the base material. Although the fatigue performance of the carburized steel is slightly worse than the base material, the solid carburized specimen shows significantly longer fatigue life. The fatigue limit increases from ca. 300 MPa for the base material to 550 MPa for the tensile carburized specimens. Detailed measurements display that the carburized layer in a carburized specimen possesses high compressive residual stresses, which arises the fatigue performance of the carburized steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

72-76

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.L. Woods, S.R. Daniewicz, R. Nellums, Increasing the bending fatigue strength of carburized spur gear teeth by presetting, Int. J. Fatigue. 21 (1999) 549-556.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(99)00011-0

Google Scholar

[2] M. Gu, G. Chen, The heat treatment technique of gear manufacturing in China, Heat Treat. Met. 30 (2005) 30-37.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, Research on deep layer carburizing technology for large gears, Ind Heat. 4 (1999) 39-41.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Chen, L. Teng, G. Li et al., Distribution characteristics of residual stress in carburized and Hardened Case. Heat Treatment, 26 (2011) 65-71.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Liu, X. Fan, Simulation of carbon concentration and hardness profile in carburized case of parts. Heat Treatment, 05 (2007) 54-55.

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Huang, D. Wagner, Q. Wang, et al. Effect of carburizing treatment on the fish eye, crack growth for a low alloyed chromium steel in very high cycle fatigue, Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 559 (2013) 790-797.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.025

Google Scholar

[7] C. Dengo, G. Meneghetti, M. Dabala, Experimental analysis of bending fatigue strength of plain and notched case-hardened gear steels, Int. J. Fatigue. 80 (2015) 145–161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.015

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Sakaida, S. Yamashita, M. Manzanka, Residual stress distribution in hardened case layer of Cr-Mo steel after carburizing and quenching, Mater. Sci. Forum. (2011) 346-351.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.681.346

Google Scholar

[9] O. Asi, A. Can, J. Pineault, et al., The relationship between case depth and bending fatigue strength of gas carburized SAE 8620 steel, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (2007) 5979-5987.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.006

Google Scholar

[10] R. Zhu, H. Xie, Y. Xue, et al., Fabrication of speckle patterns by focused ion beam deposition and its application to micro-scale residual stress measurement, Measurement Science & Technology, 26 (2015) 095601.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/26/9/095601

Google Scholar