Time Series Analysis and Statistical Process Control for Anomaly Detection: An Application to the Situation of PM 10 in Northern Thailand

Article Preview

Abstract:

The monitoring of processes is a vital mechanism for ensuring that such processes remain safe and under control. The present research aims to solve problems associated with correlated data by applying the Box-Jenkins method integrated with statistical process control (SPC) tools, namely the Shewhart chart, the moving average chart, the cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart, and the exponentially weighted moving-average (EWMA) chart. The efficiency of the four SPC tools was also compared in terms of the false alarm rate (FAR) and the missed detection rate (MDR). The findings indicated that the EWMA chart was the most effective in detecting anomaly, the Shewhart chart and the moving average chart produced high MDR, and the CUSUM chart suffered the highest FAR.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

379-382

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Kadri, F. Harrou, S. Chaabane, Y. Sun, & C. Tahon, Seasonal ARMA-based SPC charts for anomaly detection: Application to emergency department systems, Neurocomputing. 173 (2016) 2102-2114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.009

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kovárík, & P. Klímek, The Usage of Time Series Control Charts for Financial Process Analysis, Journal of Competitiveness. 4(3) (2012) 29 -45.

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. aqnis. pcd. go. th.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Taesombut, Quantitative Forecasting, Kasetsart University - Publishing Inc., Bangkok, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to statistical quality control, John Wiley & Sons. (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] S.W. Human, S. Chakraborti, & C.F. Smit, Shewhart-type control charts for variation in phase I data analysis, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 54. 4 (2010) 863-874.

DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.026

Google Scholar