An Agent-Based Factory Simulation Tool to Assess Energy Consumption in Decentralized Manufacturing Systems: Agent Types and their Tasks

Rebecca Ilsen; Jan Christian Aurich

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.869.174

Paper Titles

Evaluating Sampling Strategies for Visualizing Uncertain Multi-Phase Fluid Simulation Data
p.139

Reactive Production Control - Information to Control a Production
p.151

Integration of a Physical Model into the Realization of Engineering Changes in Manufacturing Systems
p.159

Impact of Product-Service Systems on the Energy Efficiency of Machine Tools
p.167

An Agent-Based Factory Simulation Tool to Assess Energy Consumption in Decentralized Manufacturing Systems: Agent Types and their Tasks
p.174

An Industrial Vision System to Analyze the Wear of Cutting Tools
p.183

Dependency Graph Based on User Taxonomy and Related Parameters for more Efficient Collaborative Work
p.195

Visualization and Analysis of Lighting Design Alternatives in Simulation Software
p.212

Dealing with Uncertainties in Manufacturing Process Simulations
p.226

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 869An Agent-Based Factory Simulation Tool to Assess...

An Agent-Based Factory Simulation Tool to Assess Energy Consumption in Decentralized Manufacturing Systems: Agent Types and their Tasks

Abstract:

Rising energy costs and volatile energy prices are motivation to integrate energy consumption with planning processes in manufacturing. Since centralized approaches for Manufacturing Control (MC) tend to ignore local energy related information, it is necessary to examine the potential of decentralized MC approaches. For this purpose, a factory simulation tool has been implemented. This paper presents the underlying assumptions behind the simulation tool and how the MC algorithms it uses are implemented using an agent-based simulation approach.

By email View Pdf

You have full access to the following eBook

Physical Modeling for Virtual Manufacturing Systems and Processes

Read eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 869)

Pages:

174-179

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.869.174

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2017

Authors:

Rebecca Ilsen*, Jan Christian Aurich

Keywords:

Agent-Based Factory Simulation, Decentralized Manufacturing Control, Energy-Efficient Manufacturing

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Zhang H, Zhao F, Sutherland JW (2015) Manufacturing Scheduling of Collaborative Factories for Energy Cost Reduction. 43rd Proceedings of the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME: Procedia Manufacturing.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.074

Google Scholar

[2] Reinhart G, Geiger F, Karl F, Wiedemann M (2011) Handlungsfelder zur Realisierung energieeffizienter Produktionsplanung und -steuerung. ZWF 106(09): 596–601.

DOI: 10.3139/104.110620

Google Scholar

[3] Mannmeusel T (1997) Dezentrale Produktionslenkung unter Nutzung verhandlungsbasierter Koordinationsformen. DUV, Wiesbaden.

Google Scholar

[4] Franke J, Merhof J, Hopfensitz S (2010) Einsatz von dezentralen Multiagentensystemen: Komplexitätsbeherrschung bei der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 105(12): 1075–8.

DOI: 10.3139/104.110452

Google Scholar

[5] Willeke S, Ullmann G, Nyhuis P (op. 2016) Method for an Energy-Cost-Oriented Manufacturing Control to Reduce Energy Costs. in Park S, Huang X, Joukov N, (Eds. ). 2016 International conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications (ICIMSA): Jeju Island, Korea, 23-26 May 2016. IEEE. Danvers, p.193.

DOI: 10.1109/icimsa.2016.7504018

Google Scholar

[6] Ilsen R, Meissner H, Aurich JC (2017) Optimizing Energy Consumption in a Decentralized Manufacturing System. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 17(2): 21006.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4034585

Google Scholar

[7] Willeke S, Wesebaum S, Ullmann G, Nyhuis P (2015) Energiekostenorientierte Reihenfolgebildung. ZWF 110(09): 495–9.

DOI: 10.3139/104.111368

Google Scholar