Shielding Effect and Guarding in High Resistance Measurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Generally, electric and magnetic interference will affect in high resistance measurements. This causes a large number of the standard deviation of measurement as well as the accuracy and result of measurement. The purpose of this research is to study the effectiveness of shielding and guarding on the measurement system. In experimental setup, the 1 GΩ resistance was supplied by voltage source of 100 V, 500 V and 1000 V in with and without shielding and guarding. The resistance value and standard deviation were measured and compared in each case of measurements. From the experimental results, when applying shielding and guarding, the noise can be reduced. As a result, the standard deviation was decreased more than 10 times.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

196-200

Citation:

Online since:

March 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Keithley Instruments Inc., Low Level Measurements Handbook, Sixth Edition., (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] Fluke corporation., Calibration: Philosophy in practice, Evarett WA. U.S.A., (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] Ing. Roman Honig., Practical Aspects of High Resistance Measurement, , CAL LAB The International Journal of Metrology, Vol. 17, No. 1, (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Keithley Instruments Inc., Number 312 High Resistance Measurements, Application Note Series, U.S. A.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Galliana, P.P. Capra and E. Gasparotto, Evaluation of the measurement capabilities of an high performance commercial high resistance bridge by means of the comparison with two validated high resistance measurement methods, , 17th Int. Congress of Metrology, 10001 (2015).

DOI: 10.1051/metrology/20150010001

Google Scholar

[6] Dean G. Jarrett., Automated Guarded Bridge for Calibration of Multimegohm Standard Resistor from 10 MW to 1 TW, IEEE Trans. On Instrumantation and Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 2, April (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/19.571848

Google Scholar