On the Evaluation of Behavioural Models of Buildings' Inhabitants

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper addresses the model validation challenges relevant to representation of inhabitants' presence and behavior in buildings. Motivated by the lack of general guidelines for the evaluation of user-related behavioural models in building performance simulation, the paper underlines the need for rigorous processes toward quality assurance while integrating behavioural representations in building performance simulation applications and processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-9

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. D'Oca, Valentina Fabi, Stefano P. Corgnati, Rune Korsholm Andersen, Effect of thermostat and window opening occupant behaviour models on energy use in homes, BUILD SIMUL (2014) 7: 683–694.

DOI: 10.1007/s12273-014-0191-6

Google Scholar

[2] X. Liang, T. Hong, G. Shen, Improving the accuracy of energy baseline models for commercial buildings with occupancy data, Applied Energy 179 (2016), 247-260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.141

Google Scholar

[3] A. Mahdavi, and F. Tahmasebi, The inter-individual variance of the defining markers of occupancy patterns in office buildings: a case study, Building Simulation. India, IBPSA. (2015a).

DOI: 10.26868/25222708.2015.2163

Google Scholar

[4] W. O'Brien, H. B. Gunay, F. Tahmasebi & A. Mahdavi, A preliminary study of representing the inter-occupant diversity in occupant modelling, Journal of Building Performance Simulation.

DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2016.1261943

Google Scholar

[5] W. Parys, D. Saelens and H. Hens, Coupling of dynamic building simulation with stochastic modelling of occupant behaviour in offices–a review-based integrated methodology, Journal of Building Performance Simulation 4(4): 339-358. (2011).

DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2010.524711

Google Scholar

[6] J. Langevin, J. Wen, P. L. Gurian, Simulating the human-building interaction: Development and validation of an agent-based model of office occupant behaviors, Building and Environment 88 (2015), 27–45.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.037

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Chen, X. Luo, T. Hong, An Agent-Based Occupancy Simulator for Building Performance Simulation, ASHRAE Annual Conference, At St. Louis, MO, USA. (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Mahdavi, People in building performance simulation, Building performance simulation for design and operation: 56-83. (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] A. Mahdavi, Common fallacies in representation of occupants in building performance simulation, Proceedings of Building Simulation Applications 2015 - 2nd IBPSA-Italy Conference, 1-7, Bozen-Bolzano University Press, ISBN: 978-88-6046-074-5. (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Mahdavi, F. Tahmasebi, On the quality evaluation of behavioural models for building performance applications, Journal of Building Performance Simulation (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2016.1230148

Google Scholar

[11] F. Tahmasebi & A. Mahdavi, An inquiry into the reliability of window operation models in building performance simulation, Building and Environment 105 (2016), 343–357. (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.013

Google Scholar

[12] S. B. Hulley, S.R. Cummings, W.S. Browner, D.G. Grady, T.B. Newman, Designing clinical research, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] W. A. Oleckno, B. Anderson, Essential epidemiology: principles and applications, Waveland. (2002).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Schweiker and A. Wagner, Exploring potentials and limitations of the adaptive thermal heat balance framework, Proceedings of 9thWindsor Conference, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 7-10 April 2016. (2016).

Google Scholar

[15] D. Shipworth, G. Huebner, M. Schweiker, B.R.M. Kingma, Diversity in Thermal Sensation: drivers of variance and methodological artefacts, Proceedings of 9thWindsor Conference, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 7-10 April 2016. (2016).

Google Scholar

[16] A. Mahdavi and F. Tahmasebi, Predicting people's presence in buildings: An empirically based model performance analysis, Energy and Buildings 86: 349-355. (2015b).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.027

Google Scholar

[17] F. Tahmasebi and A. Mahdavi, The sensitivity of building performance simulation results to the choice of occupants' presence models: a case study, Journal of Building Performance Simulation.

DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2015.1117528

Google Scholar

[18] I. Gaetani, P.-J. Hoes and J. L. Hensen, Occupant behaviour in building energy simulation: Towards a fit-for-purpose modelling strategy, Energy and Buildings 121: 188-204. (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.038

Google Scholar

[19] A. Mahdavi and F. Tahmasebi, The deployment-dependence of occupancy-related models in building performance simulation, Energy and Buildings 117: 313-320. (2016b).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.065

Google Scholar

[20] S. Gupta, A. Mahdavi, Exploring performance query space, SimBuild 2004, IBPSA-USA National Conference Boulder, CO. (2004).

Google Scholar

[21] P. Hoes, J. L. M. Hensen, M. G. L. C. Loomans, B. de Vries and D. Bourgeois, User behaviour in whole building simulation, Energy and Buildings 41(3): 295-302. (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.09.008

Google Scholar

[22] M. Schweiker, F. Haldi, M. Shukuya and D. Robinson, Verification of stochastic models of window opening behaviour for residential buildings, Journal of Building Performance Simulation 5(1): 55-74. (2012).

DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2011.567422

Google Scholar

[23] V. Fabi, Andersen R.K. & S. Corgnati, Verification of stochastic behavioural models of occupants' interactions with windows in residential buildings, Building and Environment, 94(1), p.371–383.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.08.016

Google Scholar

[24] F. Tahmasebi & A. Mahdavi, Optimization-based simulation model calibration using sensitivity analysis, 7th Conference of IBPSA-CZ, Brno, Czech Republic. (2012).

Google Scholar