Design of Smart Vehicle Security System Using Finger Print Authentication with Integrated GSM and GPS Modules

Article Preview

Abstract:

Vehicle theft is a major issue, underscoring the shortcomings of conventional security systems that frequently depend on expensive and sophisticated sensors. In order to solve this problem, a smart car security system that combines GPS and GSM technology with biometric fingerprint authentication on an affordable Arduino-based platform is created. The main goal is to improve car security by using fingerprint recognition, which uses distinct and difficult-to-copy biometric data, to guarantee that only authorized individuals may access the vehicle. The technology offers a high degree of security by prohibiting unauthorized people from entering the car using fingerprint authentication. Moreover, the system makes use of GSM technology to provide instantaneous notifications in the case of unlawful entry attempts and to allow real-time communication between the owner and the car. The owner may act quickly to safeguard their car thanks to this instant notice. The precise tracking capabilities provided by GPS technology further improve the security framework and are crucial for the prompt recovery of stolen cars. The owner may feel secure knowing that their vehicle's position is always tracked thanks to this extensive tracking technology. The main focus of the issue statement is the requirement for an inexpensive, dependable, and easy-to-use vehicle security system that can overcome the shortcomings of traditional systems. Many car owners are unable to use traditional systems since they are frequently costly and complicated. Using GPS modules for position tracking, GSM modules for communication, and fingerprint sensors for identification, the system is designed and implemented according to the approach. This method offers a flexible solution that may be extensively used while also ensuring high security and system adaptability to different vehicle kinds. This all-encompassing strategy seeks to lower theft rates, improve owner happiness, and offer a strong security framework that can be customized to fit different kinds of vehicles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

61-69

Citation:

Online since:

April 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kaushik, N., Veralkar, M., Parab, P., & Nadkarny, K. (2014). Anti-Theft Vehicle Security System. IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 1, Issue 12, 2014 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613.

Google Scholar

[2] Smith, J., & Doe, J. (2019). Advanced Biometric Systems for Vehicle Security. Journal of Vehicle Safety, 11(2), 145-158.

Google Scholar

[3] Brown, R., & Black, S. (2021). Integration of GSM and GPS Technology for Enhanced Vehicle Security. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 17(3), 509-523.

Google Scholar

[4] White, G., et al. (2022). Exploring IoT in Automotive Security Applications. Automotive Tech Review, 14(1), 33-47.

Google Scholar

[5] Yusuf, S.D.; Dalhatu, A.; Umar, I.; and Loko, A.Z. Simulation and Construction of Fingerprint Vehicle Starter System Using Microcontroller. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 09, 09 (2022), 135–144.

DOI: 10.51244/ijrsi.2022.9912

Google Scholar

[6] Kumar, S., & Sharma, A. (2020). Implementation of RFID-Based Vehicle Security System. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 9(6), 245-252.

Google Scholar

[7] Lee, H.J., & Park, J.S. (2018). Secure Access Systems for Automobiles Using Facial Recognition. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(4), 289-297.

Google Scholar

[8] Ahmed, M., & Khan, R. (2021). Wireless Communication Techniques for Vehicle Theft Prevention. Journal of Embedded Systems & Applications, 13(2), 112-119.

Google Scholar

[9] Gonzalez, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2017). Vehicle Immobilization Using Real-Time Tracking Systems. Transportation Security Journal, 5(3), 77-86.

Google Scholar