Comparative Study of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 for Dust Detection in Voice Coil Motor Assembly

Article Preview

Abstract:

Detecting microscopic defects in precision manufacturing remains a major challenge, particularly in hard disk drive (HDD) production where sub-millimeter dust particles on the Voice Coil Motor Assembly (VCMA) can cause performance degradation or early device failure. This study presents a comparative evaluation of three YOLO object-detection architectures—YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11—applied to high-resolution dust detection on VCMA components. All models were trained and tested using the same annotated 5-megapixel dataset under identical experimental settings to ensure fair comparison. The results show that YOLOv5 achieved the highest precision (0.640) and the highest mAP50–95 (0.253), indicating stable localization performance across strict IoU thresholds. YOLOv8 produced the highest mAP50 (0.500), reflecting strong localization accuracy at IoU 0.5, while maintaining moderate precision (0.633) and lower recall (0.455). YOLOv11 obtained the highest recall (0.636), successfully capturing the largest proportion of true dust particles, though with lower precision (0.335) and weaker mAP values, revealing a higher rate of false detections. Overall, the findings highlight clear trade-offs among the models: YOLOv5 offers the most balanced performance, YOLOv8 excels in spatial localization, and YOLOv11 is suitable for scenarios where maximum defect coverage is prioritized. These insights support the selection of appropriate detection architectures for automated micro-defect inspection and contribute to the development of AI-driven quality-control systems in HDD manufacturing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

207-212

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Q. Mao, S. Li, X. Hu, and X. Xusheng, "Coal Mine Belt Conveyor Foreign Objects Recognition Method of Improved YOLOv5 Algorithm with Defogging and Deblurring," Energies, vol. 15, p.9504, 12/14 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/en15249504

Google Scholar

[2] R. Khanam, T. Asghar, and M. Hussain, "Comparative Performance Evaluation of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 for Solar Panel Defect Detection," Solar, vol. 5, no. 1.

DOI: 10.3390/solar5010006

Google Scholar

[3] M. A. R. Alif, "Yolov11 for vehicle detection: Advancements, performance, and applications in intelligent transportation systems," arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22898, 2024.

Google Scholar

[4] L.-h. He, Y.-z. Zhou, L. Liu, W. Cao, and J.-h. Ma, "Research on object detection and recognition in remote sensing images based on YOLOv11," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 04/23 2025.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-96314-x

Google Scholar

[5] R. Khanam and M. Hussain, "Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements," arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725, 2024.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Ye et al., "YOLO-FIX: Improved YOLOv11 with Attention and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion for Detecting Glue Line Defects on Mobile Phone Frames," Electronics, vol. 14, no. 5.

DOI: 10.3390/electronics14050927

Google Scholar

[7] L. He, Y. Zhou, L. Liu, and J. Ma, "Research and Application of YOLOv11-Based Object Segmentation in Intelligent Recognition at Construction Sites," Buildings, vol. 14, no. 12.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings14123777

Google Scholar

[8] N. S. Albalawi, "High-Precision Multi-Class Object Detection Using Fine-Tuned YOLOv11 Architecture: A Case Study on Airborne Vehicles," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 16, no. 1, 2025.

DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2025.01601113

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Jia et al., "Hybrid-YOLOv5 for object detection of non-ferrous metals in end-of-life vehicles," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 07/02 2025.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-02683-8

Google Scholar

[10] A. S. Geetha and M. Hussain, "A comparative analysis of yolov5, yolov8, and yolov10 in kitchen safety," arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20872, 2024.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Prez, C. Gmez, and M. Rodrguez, "Innovative Deep Learning Techniques for Obstacle Recognition: A Comparative Study of Modern Detection Algorithms," arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10096, 2024.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Abozahhad and M. Abo-Zahhad, "Real time intelligent garbage monitoring and efficient collection using Yolov8 and Yolov5 deep learning models for environmental sustainability," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 05/08 2025.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-99885-x

Google Scholar

[13] J. Terven, D.-M. Crdova-Esparza, and J.-A. Romero-Gonzlez, "A comprehensive review of yolo architectures in computer vision: From yolov1 to yolov8 and yolo-nas," Machine learning and knowledge extraction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp.1680-1716, 2023.

DOI: 10.3390/make5040083

Google Scholar