Fatigue Evaluation of Autofrettaged Thick-Walled Cylinders with a Radial Cross-Bore

Hong Jun Li; Xun Huang; Di Liu; Qiang Ding

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.104

Paper Titles

Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Vibration Isolation System Free Oscillations
p.80

Study about the Stone Curves and the Development of Polygonal Shape Cutting Device
p.85

About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 1: Deep Beam with Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction
p.89

About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 2: Deep Beam with Piecewise Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction
p.95

Fatigue Evaluation of Autofrettaged Thick-Walled Cylinders with a Radial Cross-Bore
p.104

Testing of Mechanical Protection of Data Distribution Mechanisms
p.112

Utilization of Mosaic Sludge Waste into Fired Clay Brick: Properties and Leachability
p.117

Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Flow Characteristics of a Water Jet Impingement
p.122

Structural Design and Improvement of Wind-Driven Generator Cooling System
p.128

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1025-1026Fatigue Evaluation of Autofrettaged Thick-Walled...

Fatigue Evaluation of Autofrettaged Thick-Walled Cylinders with a Radial Cross-Bore

Abstract:

The fatigue life of autofrettaged thick-walled cylinders with a radial cross-bore is investigated by applying inelastic finite element analysis with cyclic pressure loading. A non-linear kinematic hardening model considering bauschinger effect is used for determining cyclic plastic strain ranges in fatigue evaluations. A macro is written in ANSYS to calculate the equivalent alternating stress intensity, based on the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. For a specific cyclic load level, a distinct optimum autofrettage pressure is identified by plotting autofrettage pressure against the equivalent alternating stress intensity and the number of cycles from design fatigue data. The optimum autofrettage pressure was found in the range of 80.5%-92.5% of limit pressure. The hydrotest had little influence on the fatigue life when the thick-walled cylinder was autofrettaged with an optimum autofrettage pressure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials, Structures and Mechanical Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

104-111

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.104

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2014

Authors:

Hong Jun Li*, Xun Huang, Di Liu, Qiang Ding

Keywords:

Autofrettage, Crossbore, Fatigue Evaluation, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Thick-Walled Cylinders

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] J. Perry and J. Aboudi: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 125 (2003), p.248.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Zhu and Yang: Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip Vol. 75 (1998), p.443.

Google Scholar

[3] M.H. Hojjati and A. Hassani: Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip Vol. 84 (2007), p.310.

Google Scholar

[4] X.P., Huang and T. Moan: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 131 (2009), p.021207.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Livieri and P. Lazzarin: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 124 (2002), p.38.

Google Scholar

[6] R. D. Swardt: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 128 (2006), p.190.

Google Scholar

[7] X.T. Zheng and F.Z. Xuan: J. Strain. Anal. Eng Vol. 46 (2011), p.45.

Google Scholar

[8] G.H. Majzoobi, G.H. Farrahi, and A.H. Mahmoudi: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 359 (2003), p.326.

Google Scholar

[9] L.E. Brownell and E. H. Young, in: Process Equipment Design, John Wiley & Sons (1959).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Fessler and B.H. Lewin: Br. J. Appl. Phys Vol. 7 (1956), p.76.

Google Scholar

[11] J.C. Gerdeen: J. Eng. Ind-T. ASME Vol. 94 (1972), p.815.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Makulsawatudom, D. Mackenzie and R. Hamilton: J. Strain. Anal. Eng Vol. 39 (2005), p.471.

Google Scholar

[13] L.M. Masu: Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip Vol. 72 (1997), p.171.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Hameed, R.D. Brown and J. Hetherington: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 126(2004), p.497.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Li, R. Johnston and D. MacKenzie: J. Press. Vess-T. ASME Vol. 132 (2010).

Google Scholar

[16] ASME: Article KD-3 Fatigue Evaluation, ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Division 3 Alternative Rules for High Pressure Vessels, New York (2010).

DOI: 10.1115/1.859872.ch23

Google Scholar