About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 2: Deep Beam with Piecewise Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction

Pavel A. Akimov; Marina L. Mozgaleva; Mojtaba Aslami; Oleg A. Negrozov

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.95

Paper Titles

Approach to the Ear Plate and Round Steel Connection
p.74

Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Vibration Isolation System Free Oscillations
p.80

Study about the Stone Curves and the Development of Polygonal Shape Cutting Device
p.85

About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 1: Deep Beam with Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction
p.89

About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 2: Deep Beam with Piecewise Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction
p.95

Fatigue Evaluation of Autofrettaged Thick-Walled Cylinders with a Radial Cross-Bore
p.104

Testing of Mechanical Protection of Data Distribution Mechanisms
p.112

Utilization of Mosaic Sludge Waste into Fired Clay Brick: Properties and Leachability
p.117

Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Flow Characteristics of a Water Jet Impingement
p.122

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1025-1026About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite...

About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 2: Deep Beam with Piecewise Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction

Abstract:

This paper continues series of papers devoted to verification of discrete-continual finite element method (DCFEM) for two-dimensional problems of structural analysis. Formulation of the problem for deep beam with piecewise constant physical and geometrical parameters along so-called its basic direction, solutions obtained by DCFEM and finite element method (FEM) /with the use of ANSYS Mechanical/, their comparison are presented. It was confirmed that DCFEM is more effective in the most critical, vital, potentially dangerous areas of structure in terms of fracture (areas of the so-called edge effects), where some components of solution are rapidly changing functions and their rate of change in many cases can’t be adequately taken into account by the standard FEM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials, Structures and Mechanical Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

95-103

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.95

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2014

Authors:

Pavel A. Akimov*, Marina L. Mozgaleva, Mojtaba Aslami, Oleg A. Negrozov

Keywords:

ANSYS Mechanical, Basic Direction, Deep Beam, Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method, Piecewise Constant Parameters, Structural Analysis, Two-Dimensional Problems, Verification

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K. Lawrence, in: ANSYS Tutorial Release 14, SDC Publications (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] W.A. Al-Tabey, in: Finite Element Analysis in Mechanical Design Using ANSYS: Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Handbook for Mechanical Engineers with ANSYS Tutorials, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (2012).

DOI: 10.23883/ijrter.2018.4370.4xu09

Google Scholar

[3] E.J. Barbero, in: Finite Element Analysis of Composite Materials Using ANSYS, CRC Press (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Moaveni, in: Finite Element Analysis: Theory and Application with ANSYS, Prentice Hall (2014).

Google Scholar

[5] T.A. Stolarski, N. Nakasone and S. Yoshimoto, in: Engineering Analysis with ANSYS Software, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] P.А. Akimov: Appl. Mech. Mater Vols. 204-208 (2012), p.4502.

Google Scholar

[7] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater Vols. 166-169 (2012), p.3155.

Google Scholar

[8] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater Vols. 351-352 (2013), p.13.

Google Scholar

[9] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater Vols. 353-356 (2013), p.3224.

Google Scholar

[10] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater Vols. 405-408 (2013), p.3165.

Google Scholar

[11] P.A. Akimov and V.N. Sidorov: Adv. Mater. Res Vols. 250-253 (2011), p.3652.

Google Scholar

[12] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva, in: Multilevel Discrete and Discrete-Continual Versions of Variation-Difference Method, ASV Publishing House, Moscow (2013) , in Russian.

Google Scholar

[13] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov, V.N. Sidorov and M.L. Mozgaleva, in: Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method Application in Construction, ASV Publishing House, Moscow (2010), in Russian.

Google Scholar