Utilization of Mosaic Sludge Waste into Fired Clay Brick: Properties and Leachability

Article Preview

Abstract:

Brick is one of the most common masonry units used as building material. Due to the demand, different types of waste have been investigated to be incorporated into the bricks. Many types of sludge have been incorporated in fired clay brick for an example marble sludge, stone sludge, water sludge, sewage sludge and ceramic sludge. The utilization of these waste materials in fired clay bricks usually has positive effects on the properties such as lightweight bricks with improved shrinkage, porosity, and strength. Therefore, the objective of this study is to incorporate different percentages of mosaic sludge and investigate heavy metals leachability from the mosaic sludge brick. Heavy metals leachability was conducted by using toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). Physical and mechanical properties were also determined which are compressive strength, shrinkage, density and initial rate of suction. From the results obtained, it shows that fired clay brick with 5% of mosaic sludge obtained the best result with highest compressive strength and low initial rate of suction (18.76N/mm2 and 10.08 g/mm2) respectively. Nevertheless, all the other properties for all bricks incorporated with different percentages of mosaic sludge were also complied with the BS 3921:1985 standard. The results also demonstrated that the leachability of potential heavy metals in mosaic brick were complied with USEPA (1996) and EPAV (2005a) regulatory limit. In conclusion, mosaic sludge could be an alternative low cost material for fired clay brick as well as providing a disposal method for mosaic sludge waste.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

117-121

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. B. Aziz Abdul Latif, A.T.A. Karim, A.S. Ahmad, M.B. Ridzuan and Y.T. Hung: Int. J. Integr. Eng Vol. 4(2012), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] A.M. Segadaes, M.A. Carvalho, W. Acchar: Appl. Clay. Sci Vol. 30(2005), p.42.

Google Scholar

[3] Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, Risk assessment of health hazards from lead and other heavy metals migrated from ceramic articles (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] S.K. Duggal: Building Materials, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] A.N. Victoria: Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci Vol. 3 (2013), p.69.

Google Scholar

[6] C.H. Weng, D.F. Lin and P.C. Chiang: Adv. Environ. Res Vol. 7 (2003), p.679.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Rajgor, J. Pitrod and S. Sludge: Int. J. Innov. Tech. Enplor. Eng Vol. 2 (2013), p.16.

Google Scholar

[8] A.A. Kadir and A. Mohajerani: P. I. Civil. Eng: Const. Mater. Vol. 164 (2011), p.219.

Google Scholar

[9] A.A. Kadir and A. Mohajerani: Bricks: An Excellent Building Material for Recycling Wastes, Proceedings of the Lasted International Conference Environmental Management and Engineering (EME 2011), Canada (2011).

DOI: 10.2316/p.2011.736-029

Google Scholar

[10] A. A Kadir and A. Mohajerani: Adv. Mater. Res Vol. 1 (2012), p.535, p.1723.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Boonsaner: Environmental toxicology (4th edition), Nakhon Prathom, SilpakornUniversity Press (2006).

Google Scholar

[12] J. William: Ann. Clin. Biochem Vol. 36 (1999), p.267.

Google Scholar