About Verification of Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method for Two-Dimensional Problems of Structural Analysis Part 1: Deep Beam with Constant Physical and Geometrical Parameters along Basic Direction

Article Preview

Abstract:

The distinctive paper is devoted to verification of discrete-continual finite element method (DCFEM) for two-dimensional problems of structural analysis. Formulation of the problem for deep beam with constant physical and geometrical parameters along so-called its basic direction, solutions obtained by DCFEM and finite element method (FEM) /with the use of ANSYS Mechanical/, their comparison are presented. It was confirmed that DCFEM is more effective in the most critical, vital, potentially dangerous areas of structure in terms of fracture (areas of the so-called edge effects), where some components of solution are rapidly changing functions and their rate of change in many cases can’t be adequately taken into account by the standard finite element method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

89-94

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Lawrence in: ANSYS Tutorial Release 14. SDC Publications (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] W.A. Al-Tabey in: Finite Element Analysis in Mechanical Design Using ANSYS: Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Handbook for Mechanical Engineers with ANSYS Tutorials. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (2012).

DOI: 10.23883/ijrter.2018.4370.4xu09

Google Scholar

[3] E.J. Barbero in: Finite Element Analysis of Composite Materials Using ANSYS. CRC Press (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Moaveni in: Finite Element Analysis: Theory and Application with ANSYS. Prentice Hall (2014).

Google Scholar

[5] T.A. Stolarski, N. Nakasone and S. Yoshimoto in: Engineering Analysis with ANSYS Software. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] P.А. Akimov: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vols. 204-208 (2012), p.4502.

Google Scholar

[7] P.A. Akimov P.A. and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vols. 166-169 (2012), p.3155.

Google Scholar

[8] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vols. 351-352 (2013), p.13.

Google Scholar

[9] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vols. 353-356 (2013), p.3224.

Google Scholar

[10] P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vols. 405-408 (2013), p.3165.

Google Scholar

[11] P.A. Akimov and V.N. Sidorov: Adv. Mater. Res. Vols. 250-253 (2011), p.3652.

Google Scholar

[12] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov and M.L. Mozgaleva in: Multilevel Discrete and Discrete-Continual Versions of Variation-Difference Method. ASV Publishing House, Moscow (2013), in Russian.

Google Scholar

[13] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov, V.N. Sidorov and M.L. Mozgaleva in: Mathematical Methods in Structural Mechanics. ASV Publishing House, Moscow (2008), in Russian.

Google Scholar

[14] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov, V.N. Sidorov and M.L. Mozgaleva in: Discrete-Continual Finite Element Method. Application in Construction. ASV Publishing House, Moscow (2010), in Russian.

Google Scholar

[15] A.B. Zolotov, P.A. Akimov, V.N. Sidorov and M.L. Mozgaleva in: Discrete-Continual Methods of Structural Analysis, Arkhitektura-S, Moscow (2010), in Russian.

Google Scholar