An Investigation of Fluoride Release from Orthodontic Elastomeric Ligatures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objective: The study aimed to investigate the amount of fluoride release from 3 brands of elastomeric ligatures in vitro, after exposure to daily fluoride mouthrinse. Materials and Methods: The study used 3 brands of elastomeric ligatures (Morelli, Brazil; Unitek, USA; Thai, Thailand). Two elastomeric ligatures from each brand were moistened by de-ionized water and then divided into control and test groups (n=5 per group). In both groups, elastomeric ligatures were placed in individual plastic bottle with 3 ml of de-ionized water. However, In the test group, They were exposed to fluoride mouthrinse (250 ppm fluoride/0.05%NaF) for 1 minute daily. All samples were stored at 37°C for 1, 3, 5, 7 days. After the end of each observation period, the amount of fluoride release in de-ionized water was measured by fluoride ion electrode. The data were analyzed by Kraskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p<0.05). Results: Amount of fluoride release in test group was greater than in the control group in all 3 brands. Within 7 days of daily fluoride exposure, the fluoride released from elastomeric ligatures was continuously increased. Fluoride release from Morelli (0.067±0.013 ppm) and Unitek (0.067±0.012 ppm) were significantly higher than Thai (0.040±0.03 ppm). The fluoride level measured from Morelli and Unitek were not significantly different. Conclusion: The orthodontic elastomeric ligatures can absorb fluoride from mouthwash and release the detectable amount of fluoride within seven days. This fluoride might help prevention of enamel decalcification adjacent to the bracket during orthodontic treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

787-791

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Ogaard, G. Rolla and J. Arends: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 94, No. 1 (1988), p.68.

Google Scholar

[2] M.M. O'Reilly: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 92, No. 1 (1987), p.33.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Gorton and J.D. Featherstone: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 123, No. 1 (2003), p.10.

Google Scholar

[4] S.E. Bishara and A.W. Ostby: Seminars in Orthodontics. Vol. 14, No. 3 (2008), p.174.

Google Scholar

[5] M.Y. Chin, A. Sandham, E.N. Rumachik, J.L. Ruben and M.C. Huysmans: Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 136, No. 4 (2009), p.547.

Google Scholar

[6] E.K. Basdra, H. Huber and G. Komposch: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 109, No 5 (1996), p.466.

Google Scholar

[7] B.I. Evrenol, N. Kucukkeles, T. Arun and A. Yarat: J. Clin Pediatr. Dent. 1999; Vol. 23, No. 4 (1999), p.315.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Rix D, T.F. Foley, D. Banting and A.A. Mamandras: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 120, No. 4 (2001), p.398.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Brantley and T. Elides: Orthodontic materials : scientific and clinical aspects. New York: Thieme; (2001), p.174.

Google Scholar

[10] P.E. Benson, A.A. Shah, D.T. Millett, F. Dyer, N. Parkin and R.S. Vine: J. Orthod. Vol. 32, No. 2, (2005), p.102.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Rogers, B. Chadwick and E. Treasure: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 138, No. 4 (2010), p.390.

Google Scholar

[12] W.A. Wiltshire: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 110, No. 4 (1996), p.383.

Google Scholar

[13] W.A. Wiltshire: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 115, No. 3 (1999), p.288.

Google Scholar

[14] P.A. Banks and S.M. Chadwick: Eur. J. Orthod. Vol. 22, No. 4 (2000), p.401.

Google Scholar

[15] C.R. Mattick, L. Mitchell, S.M. Chadwick and J. Wright: J. Orthod. Vol. 28, No. 3 (2001), p.217.

Google Scholar

[16] U.B. Doherty, P.E. Benson and S.M. Higham: Eur. J. Orthod. Vol. 24, No. 4 (2002), p.371.

Google Scholar

[17] P.E. Benson, C.W. Douglas CW and M.V. Martin: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 126, No. 3 (2004), p.325.

Google Scholar

[18] K.K. Miura, I.Y. Ito, C. Enoki, A.M. Elias and M.A. Matsumoto: Braz. Oral Res. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2007), p.228.

Google Scholar

[19] R.R. Miethke: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 111, No. 4 (1997) : 33A.

Google Scholar

[20] D.J. Storie, F. Regennitter and J.A. von Fraunhofer: Angle Orthod. Vol. 64, No. 3 (1994), p.199.

Google Scholar

[21] A. Kalha: Evid. Based Dent. Vol. 5, No. 4 (2004), p.98.

Google Scholar

[22] B.U. Zachrisson: Angle Orthod. Vol. 45, No. 1 (1975), p.72.

Google Scholar

[23] B. Øgaard: White Spot Lesions During Orthodontic Treatment: Mechanisms and Fluoride Preventive Aspects. Seminars in Orthodontics. Vol. 14, No. 3 (2008), p.183.

DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.003

Google Scholar

[24] P.E. Benson, N. Parkin, D.T. Millett, F.E. Dyer, S. Vine and A. Shah: Fluorides for the prevention of white spots on teeth during fixed brace treatment. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2004), p.3.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003809.pub2

Google Scholar

[25] J.M. Ten Cate: Acta odontologica Scandinavica. Vol. 57, No. 6 (1999), p.325.

Google Scholar

[26] H.C. Margolis, E.C. Moreno and B.J. Murphy: J. dental Res. Vol. 65, No. 1 (1986), p.23.

Google Scholar