Quality Control and Testing of CIPP Liners

Abstract:

The construction and rehabilitation of buildings and structures are intervention in the environment of people. Therefore, we are always looking for new technologies that are not only environmentally friendly but also acceptable from the point of view. Speed, flexibility, minimum limit for residents and transport, and also a high efficiency is the reason why more and more in recent years carried out the rehabilitation of sewerage using remediation sleeves. One of the systems of trenchless rehabilitation of sewerage systems used in Western Europe is a system company RELINEEUROPE Alphaliner Liner GmBH & co., the company's Technicians have developed one of the most important practices in the area of trenchless rehabilitation of sewerage systems. A large proportion of the development also has operators and owners of the pipeline. Technology offers very high quality of carried out restorations. This article describes the procedures for ensuring the quality of the used in Germany, which is a world leader in the development, production and use of this technology.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1044-1045)
• Pages: 1549-1552
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.1549
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Otakar Cigler*, Karel Kubečka, Petr Waldstein
• Keywords: Drains, Liners Remediation Trenchless Technologies Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation, Remediation Sleeves, Renewal of Sewers

References

[1] S. Dobiášová, K. Kubečka. Risk Analysis of Steel Construction Projects Documentation Blast Furnaces. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.564-567.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.564

[2] J. Fridrich, K. Kubečka. Fire Risk in Relation to BIM. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.552-555.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.552

[3] K. Kubečka. Application of Research results in teaching students, ICERi 2010 International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation: 15-17 Nov 2010, Madrid Spain.

[4] K. Kubečka, S. Dobiášová, J. Fridrich, P. Vlček and M. Nič. Instruments for Risk Analysis as an Alternative Decision-Making Method in the Forensic Sciences. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.556-559.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.556

[5] K. Kubečka, P. Vlček, D. Kubečková and D. Pieszka. Utilization of Risk Analysis Methods in Decision-Making Process on Fitness of Rehabilitation. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.568-571.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.568

[6] K. Kubečka, P. Vlček and D. Kubečková. Assessment and Damage for Building Structures Risk Analysis Methods. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.535-538.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.535

[7] H. Vaculíková, P. Vlček, K. Kubečka, J. Česelský and M. Nič. Application of Risk Analysis by the Evaluation of Buildings Indoor Environment. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.531-534.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.531

[8] P. Vlček, K. Kubečka, H. Vaculíková, D. Kubečková and V. Sojková. Risk Analysis of Asbestos Structures and their Impact on the Internal Environment of Buildings. Advanced Materials Research. 2014, vol. 899, pp.431-434.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.431