Dynamic Thrust Allocation of Dynamic Positioning Vessel Based on Model Predictive Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dynamic positioning (DP) vessel maintains its position and heading by active thrusters. For safety reasons, DP vessels are typically designed with redundancy thrusters more than needed for motion control. Optimization theories are useful in finding thrust allocation solutions that minimize fuel consumption and reduce “wear and tear” on a thruster. But several challenges exist such as uncertain thruster model, thruster dynamics characters and the individual limitations of the thrusters. In this paper, a dynamic thrust allocation scheme is presented based on model predictive control (MPC) that directly takes thrusters with dynamics characters and various constraints into account. It is shown in simulations that the MPC dynamic thrust allocation scheme performs better in comparison with an existing static allocation method. Its main advantage is the ability to handle thruster dynamics characters and various constraints.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1049-1050)

Pages:

996-999

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Tor A. Johansen, Thor I. Fossen and Bjørnar Vik. Hardware-in-the-loop testing of DP systems . DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE November 15-16, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] T.I. Fossen, Marine Control Systems: Guidance, Navigation and Control of Ships, Rigs, and Underwater Vehicles, Marine Cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Smogeli, N., A. J. Sørensen and T. I. Fossen. Design of a hybrid power/torque thruster controller with loss estimation. IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)31766-4

Google Scholar

[4] Thor I. Fossen and Tor A. Johansen. A Survey of Control Allocation Methods for Ships and Underwater Vehicles Control and Automation, 2006. MED '06. 14th Mediterranean Conference, 2006, p.1 – 6.

DOI: 10.1109/med.2006.235844

Google Scholar

[5] D. Q Mayne, J.B. Rawlings, C. V Rao and P.O.M. Scokaert. Constrained model predictive control:stability and optimality. AUTOMATICA, 36(6): 789-814, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00214-9

Google Scholar

[6] Furong Liu; Hui Chen. Application of Moving Horizon Filter for Dynamic Positioning Ship. 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE). 2010, 12.

DOI: 10.1109/cise.2010.5676743

Google Scholar