Role of Temperature Change on Poly(DL-lactic acid) Porous Matrix Film Fabrication by Solvent Casting Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) has a variety of applications. It has been widely used in the biomedical and pharmaceutical fields due to its biocompatibility and biodegradability. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is used as an inactive ingredient in the pharmaceutical industry as a solvent, plasticizer, surfactant, ointment base, suppository base, tablet lubricant and capsule lubricant. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of temperature change on PLA porous matrix film fabricating by solvent casting method with an addition of PEG400 to improve and increase the pore interconnectivity. Their mechanical properties such as tensile strength (TS) and % elongation at break (%E) and morphology were investigated. Porous films were prepared at 4 °C for 24 h and dry at room temperature for 24 h (4CRT), 4 °C for 24 h and dry at 60 °C for 24 h (4C60C), -20 °C for 24 h and dry at room temperature for 24 h (-20CRT), -20 °C for 24 h and dry at 60 °C for 24 h (-20C60C), -80 °C for 24 h and dry at room temperature for 24 h (-80CRT), and -80 °C for 24 h and dry at 60 °C for 24 h (-80C60C). 4C60C exhibited the highest strength and toughest, however all of samples showed the quite soft behavior. From topography study they displayed the different porous structure which sample of 4C60C displayed the smallest porous structure. Therefore, the temperature change between the fabrication processes affected the TS, %E and morphology structure of PLA porous matrix films.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

184-187

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Garlotta: J. Polym. Environ. Vol. 9 (2001), pp.63-84.

Google Scholar

[2] L.T. Lim, R. Auras and M. Rubino: Prog. Polym. Sci. Vol. 33 (2008), pp.820-852.

Google Scholar

[3] K.M. Nampoothiri, N.R. Nair and R.P. John: Bioresource. Technol. Vol. 101 (2010), pp.8493-8501.

Google Scholar

[4] R.M. Rasal, A.V. Janorkar and D.E. Hirt: Prog. Polym. Sci. Vol. 35 (2010), p.338–356.

Google Scholar

[5] L.T. Sin, A.R. Rahmat and W.A.W.A. Rahman, in: Handbook of Biopolymers and Biodegradable Plastics, edited by S. Ebnesajjad, A volume in Plastics Design Library, page, 55-69, William Andrew Publising (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-2834-3.00003-3

Google Scholar

[6] Information on http: /www. drugs. com/inactive/polyethylene-glycol-400-272. html.

Google Scholar

[7] Information on http: /www. sciencelab. com/msds. php?msdsId=9926620.

Google Scholar

[8] O. Martin and L. Avérous. Polymer. Vol. 42 (2001), pp.6209-6219.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Pitt, Y. Cha, S. Shah and K. Zhu: J. Control. Release. Vol. 19 (1992), pp.189-200.

Google Scholar

[10] A.G. Mikos, A.J. Thorsen, L.A. Czerwonka, Y. Bao, R. Langer, D.N. Winslow and J.P. Vacanti: Polymer. Vol. 35 (1994), pp.1068-1077.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-9

Google Scholar

[11] W.L. Murphy, R.G. Dennis, J.L. Kileny and D.J. Mooney: Tissue. Eng. Vol. 8 (2002), pp.43-52.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Ohya, H. Matsunami and T. Ouchi: J. Biomat. Sci. Vol. 15 (2004), pp.111-123.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Borden, M. Attawia, Y. Khan and C.T. Laurencin: Biomaterials. Vol. 23 (2002), pp.551-559.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00137-5

Google Scholar

[14] Y.K. Luu, K. Kim, B.S. Hsiao, B. Chu and M. Hadjiargyrou: J. Control. Release. Vol. 89 (2003), pp.341-353.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Khalil, J. Nam and W. Sun: Rapid. Prototyping. J. Vol. 11 (2005), pp.9-17.

Google Scholar

[16] J.S. Chen, S.L. and R.Y. Tsay: J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. E. Vol. 41 (2010), pp.229-238.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Chitrattha and T. Phaechamud: Key. Eng. Mat. Vol. 545 (2013), pp.57-62.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Memon and A. Nakai: Energy. Procedia. Vol. 34 (2013), p.830–838.

Google Scholar

[19] X. Xiong, M. Lin, W. Zou and X. Liu: React. Funct. Polym. Vol. 71 (2011), pp.964-971.

Google Scholar

[20] F. Sun, H. Zhou and J. Lee: Acta. Biomater. Vol. 7 (2011), pp.3813-3828.

Google Scholar