Determination of Experimental Conditions of Preparation of Zeolites from Fly Ashes via Alkaline Fusion Followed by Hydrothermal Crystallization

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, we converted high silicon fly ashes (FA) to zeolites using a two stages conversion process: alkaline fusion followed by hydrothermal crystallization. The orthogonal experimental method was applied to design the experimental variables of alkaline fusing and hydrothermal crystallizing procedure. Alkaline fusion prior to hydrothermal synthesis was applied to collapse the FA crystalline phases and release Si content. Different from most of the research, the mixtures of NaOH and Na2CO3 were used to increase the fusion temperature in order to remove the residue carbon simultaneously. Acid solubility was used to evaluate the efficiency of alkaline fusion. Then the optimized alkali-fused FA was resolved in the NaOH solutions and the experiment conditions were designed by the orthogonal experimental method. XRD and SEM were employed to characterize the crystalline phases and microimages of the raw FA and the treated FA. Adsorption process of methylene blue was applied to simulate the adsorption ability of the fly ash zeolites. Finally, the optimized conditions of alkaline fusion and hydrothermal treatment were concluded.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1061-1062)

Pages:

342-350

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Henmi. New Ceramics 7 (1997), 54–62.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Ahmaruzzaman, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(2010): 327-363.

Google Scholar

[3] H. -L. Chang and W. -H. Shih. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 4185–4191 (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] P. Kumar, Y. Oumi, T. Sano and K. Yamana. J. Ceram. Soc., Japan 109, 968–973 (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] O. Babajide, N. Musyoka, L. Petrik, F. Ameer. Catalysis Today 190 (2012) 54– 60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.044

Google Scholar

[6] H. Tanaka, S. Matsumura, S. Furusawa and R. Hino. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 22, 323–325 (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] H. Tanaka, S. Matsumura and R. Hino. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 1677–1682 (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] M.R. El-Naggar, A.M. El-Kamash, M.I. El-Dessouky, A.K. Ghonaim. Journal of Hazardous Materials 154 (2008) 963–972.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.115

Google Scholar

[9] M. Inada, H. Tsujimoto, Y. Eguchi, N. Enomoto and J. Hojo. Fuel 84, 1482–1486 (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Kazemian, Z. Naghdali, T. Ghaffari Kashani, F. Farhadi. Advanced Powder Technology 21 (2010) 279–283.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2009.12.005

Google Scholar

[11] M. Park and J. Choi. Clay Sci. 9, 219–229 (1995).

Google Scholar

[12] H Höller, U Barth-Wirsching. Fortschr Miner 1985; 63: 21–43.

Google Scholar

[13] S Rayalu, SU Meshram, MZ Hasan. J Hazard Mater 2000; 77: 123–31.

Google Scholar

[14] S Rayalu, JS Udhoji, KN Munshi, MZ Hasan. J Hazard Mater 2001; 88: 107–21.

Google Scholar

[15] HL Chang, WH Shih. Ind Eng Chem Res 1998; 37: 71–8.

Google Scholar

[16] X Querol, F Plana, A Alastuey, A Lopez-Soler, JM Andres, R Juan, et al. Environ Sci Technol 1997; 31: 2527–32.

Google Scholar

[17] T. Hidekazu, Atsushi Fujii, F Satoshi and T Yoshiki. Advanced Powder Technology 19 (2008) 83–94.

Google Scholar

[18] M Park, CL Choi, WT Lim, MC Kim, J Choi, NH Heo. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2000; 37: 81–9.

Google Scholar

[19] M Park, CL Choi, WT Lim, MC Kim, J Choi, NH Heo. Micropor Mesopor Mater 37(2000): 91–8.

Google Scholar